Just to follow up on Anne’s posting below – I have just posted the following on 
the blogspot: 
http://scarletwindmill.blogspot.com/2010/11/were-all-in-this-together-inquiry.html

______________

 

BREAKING NEWS: British reserve is a myth!

 

I have been reflecting on our circular, inclusive, random and underground 
conference on the theme of ‘we are all in this together’. Here are some of the 
thoughts I have been left with:

 

The famous ‘British reserve’ may not be so reserved. I found that the nearly 
all the people I approached were willing to have a conversation. Maybe I just 
chose conversational people, of course. But maybe, just maybe, people are more 
willing to talk than we sometimes believe.

 

There was a distinct sadness in some people. 

 

I remember the person from the construction industry who said wistfully that 
whilst the builders, the architects, the surveyors, the contractors (and so 
forth) really ought to work as if they were all in this together – they don’t. 
He seemed very sad about this – and regretted that people, instead, retrenched 
and retreated into their silos. (Perhaps we will know that people do believe we 
are all in this together when we see more collaborative working across the 
divides that... divide us.)

 

There was also sadness in the otherwise very jolly couple from San Francisco – 
who, it seemed, spent their time visiting friends whom they had met on previous 
visits. But they were sad that in America people were far more discourteous 
than ever before and reached for the ‘finger’ all too easily.

 

But out of sadness and grief came resolution and optimism. I recall the woman 
who declared herself very much a ‘glass half full’ kind of person which she 
traced back to when her Father died when she was quite young. She said this 
event gave her the courage to grab each day and each opportunity to make the 
most of what she had. 

 

I was saddened, a little, by the conversation I had with the young woman from 
M&S – who wished for much more of the ‘we are all in this together’ spirit in 
her own workplace. She said instead that the place was riven by cliques and 
departmental battles. 

 

There was the woman who worked for a bank and said she would sometimes tell 
people she worked as a dancer – just to avoid the inevitable conversations 
about how evil she was! Or rather she said that she thought about pretending to 
be someone else but never quite did it. 

 

But in all this sadness there was hope and determination – and a recognition – 
that if we have any chance to get out of the mess we are in then we are going 
to have to make ‘we are all in this together’ a meaningful reality.

 

Perhaps the most radical thing that anyone can do to address the fragmented, 
worried and greedy society that it appears that we live in, is to start up a 
conversation with a complete stranger and see what happens. We may be surprised 
by the outcome.

 

Here’s to the revolution – one conversation at a time!

 

___________

 

Do add any thoughts you might have here – or on the blog.  Thanks!

 

And yes Michael, thought I never met him, I could quite imagine that Colin 
Morely would have loved to have taken part too: Just came across this story 
(there is an inquest currently going on into the 7/7/05 bombings in London):

 

http://news.scotsman.com/uk/77-inqueset-Death-of-a.6617869.jp

7/7 inquest: Death of a genius

Published Date: 09 November 2010

A MARKETING "genius" was preparing to dedicate his life towards "making the 
world a better place" when he was killed.

Colin Morley, 52, of Finchley, north London, was described by his wife, Ros, as 
a highly skilled marketing and advertising executive who never lost his passion 
for learning and had an unstoppable zest for life. In a statement read at the 
inquests, Mrs Morley said the couple were preparing to move to St Albans to 
spend more time together and do work that was closer to his heart. She said: 
"He was so excited and positive about how he might help improve the place we 
were living in a broad strategic sense." 

 

In peace 

 

Jon

 

 

From: OSLIST [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ANNE BENNETT
Sent: 19 November 2010 18:50
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: speaking from the center

 

Here is a story from today, 'speaking from the circle', this time the Circle 
line of the London Underground. The amazing Jon Harvey, friends Winston Moore 
and Anthony Albert Moore Bastos and myself undertook a small experiment - we 
'opened space' on a sunny subterranean Friday afternoon between station stops 
with travellers hopping on and off with fellow strangers - what kind of space, 
we are now asking [why is certainly another question - see 
www.scarletwindmill.blogspot.com] ? Well we each felt the sanctity of the 
internal space - the independent and private and protected individual 
passenger...the very British reserve in two of our team, and the very Bolivian 
warmth of the other two. We encountered the solo, the coupled, the groups, 
different personalities, different moods, different reactions - a (surprising? 
assumptions becoming conscious) large proportion wanted to connect, to engage, 
to support the idea of direct human communication (in unexpected context, 
contrasting the exclusion that comes with those engrossing phones and web-based 
garrulousness) - so many non-Brits so adamant that London is a friendly and 
chatty place, the word 'sorry' comes before the offensive gesture, the 
ear-phones were readily removed, the wary smiles wanting to be reassured - and 
of course we were at our least intimidating/weird [entirely subjective I guess] 
- and plenty of others did not get disturbed through unconscious/unobservable 
collusion. Jon feared that standing over the seated passenger would be wrong, I 
felt that this made me seem less committed/imposing than sitting besides....our 
young colleague was boldest in inviting strangers to converse with each other 
(bypassing our estimable facilitation). A sense of community/social capital 
circulating on the circle today? [in the midst of news stories here about 'who 
is having a good/bad time of it really?', and what measures happiness, and how 
people were Good Samaritans or Apathetic Bystanders during our tube terror 
attacks in 2005, etc etc] - an existential moment is opened - a psychic and 
social space.

 

On the subject of 'owning' a theme, and of 'engaging too intimately' with the 
people doing the work...here we were more authentic 
(conscious/sentient/reflective practitioners?) I think - a pure 
disengagement/affected indifference is as great a risk to the quality of 
interaction and outcomes as the unthinking misuse of the hosting power? We were 
drawn into our agendas, we looked for appreciative inquiry, we drew on our 
practice and experience with (among other things) group relations, systems 
thinking and Zeldin's big conversations...would love to hear more from people 
drawing on meta-methodologies to weave these new human fabrics.... 
 

Anne 

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Suzanne Daigle <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 19 November, 2010 12:06:57
Subject: Re: speaking from the center

Dear Michael (first) and all the other amazing people who have spoken here also,

Meshing the physical, the words, the feel, the intention: how well you have 
described this Michael starting with the beautiful example of the wheel chair. 
In that moment, I somehow felt what it must feel like to be sitting in a wheel 
chair and how often, they must feel people tower over them. Not wanting to 
tower over people by being too close can also happen as my eyes meet those of 
the participants so I apply this same intention leaving private space for 
people to breathe into what they are feeling, nervous, uncomfortable, etc. 
That's why as I let my eyes meet those of the participants walking the circle 
for the first times, with some people it may only be a split second, with 
others a tiny bit longer. I want to honor and respect their physical space and 
internal space. 

I also just love the transition you describe from the focus on you to the group 
beginning to focus on itself while walking the circle. Harrison mentions how he 
invites the group to let their eyes go around the circle; your description 
brings awareness to this transition.

And then finally, the pre-work you speak of in weeks and months) which I have 
also experienced, feeling at times it is a journey of mutual courage to 
accompany a client and a team as they wrestle with the difficult moments of 
inviting people to something that they cannot fully describe as most often they 
have not experienced open space themselves.  I am always humbled by their trust 
and the deep relationship that develops. 

 But oh my....what I have understood so "painfully" just now is what I have 
done wrong too many times, "caring too much" for the theme, sometimes almost 
more than the sponsor or host.  When the theme touches my sense of values and 
principles, I become so energized...too energized during the pre-work and I 
know now (painfully but with such appreciation to you Michael for bringing it 
to a very deep awareness for me) that in doing so I was consuming space that 
belongs to the host and the group.  Learning this and practicing this will be 
my next very big challenge. I also realize now that by engaging too much on the 
theme with the host, it can make the post-work all the more difficult. I think 
that perhaps my relationship with the host/team may be too close.  

 Now to lighten the topic a bit, I agree Harold that it's so wonderful walking 
the circle when we know some or many of the participants.  I've often thought 
of opening space is the same way that I like to welcome people to my home.  
Typically in the most comfortable way possible (not too stuffy or fancy or to 
impress) I prepare everything ahead (food, space, dishes, fridge full, 
welcoming, tidied up and clean with time before they arrive for me to relax and 
imagine them there). Then my mission is to have my home become their home, no 
hosting or working/serving just showing them where stuff is and then letting 
everyone be equal to just relax and have a great time. 

 Hugs to all, smiling now as I think of all this wonderful insight for Eleder, 
who in the end need only remember to just be himself and enjoy.

 Suzanne

 

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Michael M Pannwitz <[email protected]> wrote:

A few years ago I badly strained my foot and could move about only in a wheel 
chair... which I also did facilitating an open space with 200 highschool 
students on the issue of racism ("Me, a racist?" was the theme). I did feel 
very relaxed being "de-elevated" and at the same level with the students as I 
"walked" the circle.
Reflecting on that experience I now always take care to have a circle of at 
least 10 meters in diameter so that I am not too close to the seated 
participants, too towering as I walk (my habit is to walk it once or a bit more 
than once, sometimes two times... changing my mode of movement after that 
"focusing the group" part which I do with the idea that the group begins to 
focus on itself... and eventually using the entire space as a dancer would on a 
stage with the idea that it is a space that can be used in all ways possible).

On prework: I do work intensively with the sponsor and the planning group on 
all aspects of the event sometimes months before the OS event itself with the 
result that I get to know them, they get to know me and, of course, I also get 
to know about their theme and what it is they want to achieve.
All that I now consider a side-effect.
What I am really interested in is that they craft their event and that they are 
clear on their theme and on what they want to achieve.
I, however, focus on the myriad of things that I know support their work: the 
space, the time, the material, the food, the documentation technicalities, the 
public address system, the team, the briefing of the sponsor, facilitating the 
planning meeting and the Next Meeting(s) after the event... and, of course, 
getting myself into the mysterious mode of "presence and invisibility".
Essentially, my relationship with the theme will not substitute their passion 
for it. I respect it, yes. And my relationship with the people which 
inadvertendly developes is much less essential than the spirit that developes 
in the Planning Group, for instance. I love them, yes.
My experience is that me getting into the theme (more than even the 
participants) or my relationship with the Planning Group becoming intensive 
(more than the relationship between the members of the Planning Group) can 
deflect the focus in a way that both my presence and invisibility necessary for 
my focus on space and time for the forces of selforganisation are deminished.
Greetings from Berlin
mmp


Harold Shinsato wrote:

 Great sharings from all around...

This might also help... something I read in a book about llama care. Llamas 
don't like to be touched normally, but if you do it often enough they become 
desensitized and won't mind being touched and handled. The same is true for a 
lot of things humans don't feel comfortable about - at first. It's one of the 
reasons Lisa's training was so valuable for me - getting experience walking and 
talking in the circle "desensitizes" to the discomfort so one can spend more 
time tuning into the energy of the room and being what they need from me as a 
facilitator. That's also a lot easier when I already feel I have a relationship 
with the theme and the people because of strong pre-work (another thing Lisa 
emphasizes).

It has also helped knowing a lot of the people in the room - getting a chance 
to talk make eye contact even before getting into the circle, and having some 
friendly faces to help remember it's all good.

And the trick that Harrison mentioned is also something that Dale Carnegie put 
in his "How to Win Friends and Influence People" classic. If you feel nervous, 
just admit it and move on. The transparency puts people at ease and you stop 
having to fight wondering whether anyone is noticing that you are nervous.

   Harold



On 11/18/10 9:42 PM, Lisa Heft wrote:

Hello, dear Eleder - once again you ask great questions.

Everyone has shared so wonderfully.
The only things I would add are:

In my Open Space Learning Workshop one of the things folks do is practice 
walking and talking in that circle.
And yes - others have mentioned as you have their concern with having their 
backs to someone as they speak.

What they have found is similar to what was mentioned here - if you look a few 
people ahead and keep moving (slowly, breathing, present) you are indeed never 
having your back to anyone for very long. If you turn your head as you move you 
are including people behind you as you travel, as well. If your voice is loud 
enough or you have a microphone everyone can hear you even if you are not 
facing everyone.

Of course this is all different if some people in your circle have any hearing 
differences such as deafness or other hearing loss - so it is always good to 
ask on registration forms who has any access / ability / mobility issues they 
would like to bring to event coordinators' attention. Then you have this extra 
info if you need it for some individuals, and can give them extra eye contact 
or some notes as well.

*
/
It is true that having too small a circle and towering over people is hard for 
them - so do make a nice big circle with room in between each chair. And if it 
is too small on the inside I see no problem with walking the outside of the 
circle (though when I have done this some of my OS colleagues have *gasped* !.  
But it is so I do not close everyone in too tightly, in those instances.

I have also learned from my workshop participants that if you have any 
nervousness about looking people in the eye, try instead....looking at the tops 
of their heads (!).
It often feels like you are looking at them - try it.

But I think you will become more and more comfortable as you practice, sort how 
you like to say things, and experience yourself doing it more and more.

Sometimes if it is a tense event to come - I may set up the circle and then 
walk, it, before any participants arrive. And I envision the participants and 
their listening faces, and I smile and welcome them before they get there.

Mostly - Suzanne said it so well: it is of course not about you. It is about 
them. So if you focus on them and on making your voice and the instructions 
something they can hear and that invites them, then once you begin you are in 
partnership with them - and they can feel it...

And the other 'mostly' is: remember you are in your walking, your breathing, 
your explaining - creating a container that is open and welcoming and has tools 
and a process - so that they can do their best work.
You are with your walk, your voice, your instructions, your breathing... 
weaving that open and inviting container. And in your walking you are invoking 
(calling in) energy.  
And you know how to do that, dear Eleder - just.... breathe.... and ... go.... 
and be amazed, as I know you are....

Lisa

Lisa Heft
/
*
Consultant, Facilitator, Educator
*Opening Space*

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>



-- 
Harold Shinsato
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://shinsato.com
twitter: @hajush <http://twitter.com/hajush>


* * ========================================================== 
[email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, 
unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
[email protected]: 
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about 
OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist


-- 

Michael M Pannwitz, boscop eg

Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany


++49-30-772 8000
[email protected]
www.boscop.org



Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 412 resident Open Space 
Workers in 71 countries working in a total of 141 countries worldwide
Have a look:
www.openspaceworldmap.org

*
*
==========================================================


[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist




-- 
Suzanne Daigle
NuFocus Strategic Group
7159 Victoria Circle
University Park, FL 34201
FL 941-359-8877;  
CT 203-722-2009
www.nufocusgroup.com
[email protected]
twitter @suzannedaigle

* * ========================================================== 
[email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, 
unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
[email protected]: 
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about 
OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist 

* * ========================================================== 
[email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, 
unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
[email protected]: 
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about 
OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist


*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to