I would allow the open space process to do the work. I don't see a reason to do anything else. I could be misunderstanding of course.
if you are using a 'standard' open space agenda creation process, inviting people to put a topic on a sheet of paper and post it on a wall with time and place, then i'd allow the wall to be filled with topics, and then explain the process of moving topics around based on the wishes of the convenors. and let them move things around. let the law of mobility take care of the rest. and then reflect at the end of the day, and they might add and delete and move topics for the second day. jeff On 2/11/13, Tricia Chirumbole <[email protected]> wrote: > ok, so I just asked a question re: the need for prioritization of issues > and an overwhelmingly large pool of issues in my previous post. > > I guess part of the answer is sticky dot voting. Cool. I will have to > improvise asking people to keep track of their dots using markers since I > will have no time to get dots, but that should be ok in a small gorup of > 13...not ideal - other thoughts on this are welcome. > > my questions are - is it ok to do prioritization at outset of day 1? And, > if so, would it be better to first generate a marketplace w/o times > selected and prioritize them, then have initiators select time/place? or > vice versa - neither sound ideal to me. > > thanks so much!! > > -- > Tricia Chirumbole > US: +1-571-232-0942 > Skype: tricia.chirumbole > _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
