Leon DeKing wrote: > Chris: > Suggestion #1: On the grounds that what you seek (Experiences > in Open Space Follow-up) and what Terry and I are webing about > (Turning Open Space experienced Supervisors into Super Supervi- > sors) are really one and the same, I recommend you study the > above edition of Terry's & my interaction (OSLIST Aug. 11- > Aug 12).
> Idea: Am I right in thinking that we three have a great > OSonOS VI (Monterey) break-out meeting(s) topic on our hands? Dear Leon & others who responded. An update. Perhaps I phased it badly, but I was never anticipating using OS as a training methodology as one reply castigated me for. The client had been searching out a template against which to measure a formal training process to develop the sci-fi sounding 'super supervisor'. My suggestion was to first raise the issues around supervision through OS and, if required, address follow up support afterwards according to need. My request to the list (asked by an intermediary) was for examples where this approach had been used before to good, or otherwise, effect. In the event, the client (a task orientated engineering giant) stayed with the comfort of more traditional 'gap analysis' methods. Leon, however, identified a need within the list and a break out topic for OSon OS VI in Monterey. An impossible journey for me to make but I would request that if it happens I receive some synopsis of the discussion and actions, if any. Thanks for all the positive correspondence. Terry
