Replying to LO25846 Hello At:
At 16:51 05-01-2001 +0200, AM de Lange wrote:
However, Artur made me thinking deeply over the festive period. He insists that "tacit knowledge" is of a higher order than "formal knowledge". I suggested to him that he may be confusing "formal knowledge" which inside a person with "information" which can be formulated outside a person. This is one possibility. However, there is also another possibility. That is the wisdom not articulate certain knowledge which will be detrimental at a too immature stage of development. That wisdom is tacit (but not tacit knowledge) to those whom the knowledge cannot be articulated. This is exactly what Winfried has written about.
First, I have used (as Polanyi) "tacit knowing" and not "tacit knowledge". Now you understant why... Second: you said:
That wisdom is tacit (but not tacit knowledge) to those whom the knowledge cannot be articulated.
Here we go again: tacit knowing is the one that CAN NOT be articulated (by no one)... Regards Artur PS: have you already read your Christmas books? Did you began with the one I have suggested? ----------- <artsi...@mail.eunet.pt> * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html =========================================================== osl...@egroups.com To subscribe, 1. Visit: http://www.egroups.com/group/oslist 2. Sign up -- provide an email address, and choose a login ID and password 3. Click on "Subscribe" and follow the instructions To unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@egroups.com: 1. Visit: http://www.egroups.com/group/oslist 2. Sign in and Proceed
