Hello Dear Lisa:

At 16:25 12-06-2001 -0700, Lisa Heft wrote:
Friends -- I would like to share with you an experience I had last week
-- I am still mulling it over (...) I learn the most when you
all share the 'crumbly' moments as well as the perfect ones.  I shall do
the same here.

Thanks for your story. Much courage is needed to share a "less than perfect"
story. But  I agree with you that "less than perfect" stories are the ones
that can teach us most.

Reading your mail I felt that it was not a story of ONE OST but a story
of TWO different OSTs, for the same people.

I think the main problem was the change of room and the fact that
you could not use the walls in the second one. So I assume that you
couldn't move the  Boletin Board. Were there any sessions
planned in day 1 to de held on day 2?

Has anyone the experience of changing the main room in the middle of
a single OS?

I think of OS as "changing meeting rules" (for the ones of OST).
If then you distribute the proceedings of Day 1 and begin day 2
with something that is not exactly OST (like storytelling) I suspect
thay you are transmiting signals that a different event began and maybe
that confused people (?).

I am not sure about that, of course, and would like to see other opinions.

And what if the second day would be tretead as a different OST with
a sligtly diferent theme and openning?

I have no solution, only more questions... Anyhow...


 Eventually the groups that wanted to got together, the same deep
learning and communication ensued, and in the closing circle all the
right comments came out.  We even did written evaluations after this
event, and the evals underlined peoples' delight with this new process,
wish to use it again although in a longer conference (a full 2 days, for
example or 2.5 days), and overwhelmingly positive comments on how
networking and finding out things in common was one of the biggest
benefits of their experience together.  There was even an announcement
for a next similar meeting.  And even better, there were a few comments
on how, if this group was waiting for a leader to tell them when to
begin, maybe that was reflective of their current situation in the
California Central Valley -- nothing is being done because everybody is
waiting for some outside leader to tell them when to begin -- when in
reality *they* are the leaders -- *they* are the people they have been
waiting for.

I couldn't have hoped for a better outcome.

...in the end, it worked ok. Those are good news, aren't they?

Regards

Artur

*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected],
Visit:

http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

Reply via email to