Bernd I just read my own posting. The way I put it, it seems to be quite wrong. Much too generally formulated Sorry Bernd
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:50:30 +0200, WB-TrainingConsultingDevelopment wrote: Joelle, one thing is for shure. It has nothing to do with mathematics (if you do not use strange mathematical techniques of giving extra-weight to slightly stronger items). Bernd On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:51:48 EST, Joelle Lyons Everett wrote: Lisa-- This is a question I have wondered about also--but I am not a mathematician. One phenomenon that I have observed with almost any method of convergence is that a handful of ideas generally come to the top. Don't know whether this is a mathematical phenomenon or a reflection of underlying agreement in the group, which may have been invisible up to this point. Seems like it might be related to the fact that the same conversation often goes on in several breakout sessions, regardless of the posted session topic. There are a lot of things in group dynamics which I can observe but not explain. And I hope someone has a mathematical formula for deciding how many dots to give out. Joelle * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu, Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu, Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu, Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
