Thanks to Martin and Artur for this great discussion of methologies. In my twenty-plus years of facilitation, working with a variety of methods, there have certainly been times when I have revised a design to meet unexpected circumstances. . .though usually that has been in the direction of abandoning my planned activity to go with the idea, more appropriate to this moment, that has emerged from the group.
Recently I was facilitating a two-day Open Space for an organization that was facing a mandated restructuring (mandated by the funding agency for this non-profit group). The first day, there was a lot of tension in the room, and much distrust. Predictably, participants were not very open in sharing their true feelings and ideas. I had dinner with the management team, and they were not happy. Some were angry that staff members were not taking full advantage of this wonderful opportunity to participate in the restructuring process. Others were angry that their staff members were being put down for being there with their true feelings of fear and distrust. We spent three hours over dinner. Almost everyone thought we should do something different, but no one knew what to do. I finally said that Day Two would begin, as usual, with Morning News, and I would make it clear that feelings could be shared, as well as new session announcements. I went to bed feeling that I was probably the only one who thought this was going to work. In the morning, after a few logisitical announcements, a young man stood and asked if he could announce a new session. "I have some questions that haven't been answered, and I hope that some of the managers will join me in this session." The director immediately replied that she would be there, and would answer any questions she had answers for. Two other small groups convened as scheduled, and most of the 60 people stayed in the room. The young man asked his questions calmly and without blame. He persisted until he was satisfied that he and others had asked everything that was on their minds and hearts. The director sat on the floor, and answered every question she could, with no defensiveness. Other managers contributed further information. A young woman pulled up a flip chart and started listing "What we know. . ." After 45 minutes, it seemed that everyone's questions had been answered, so the convenor said, "I think it is over." As you might guess, the tone of the rest of the day was quite different. Noise levels were higher as many people enthusiastically participated in discussions. I heard laughter, and a lot of ideas being proposed. I can't imagine anything that I could have done as a facilitator, or that the design team could have done, that would have been as powerful as holding space for the group to do the work themselves! It is this kind of experience that encourages me to use OST whenever it seems appropriate. And I agree with Artur that it is the new structure of OS that creates the possibility of change. Joelle * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected], Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
