I am wondering if this is a connecting idea. We (circles concerned with global and local impacts of networks since 1984) are seeking to open source a manifesto with the help of many communities ( this one would be wonderful, youth is another one I have started mailing anywhere I know to)
The manifesto is to focus on clues or laws that people would like the world's 100 biggest organisational networks to be governed by. Nothing sacred about 100 accept we might as well influence the superpowers first because I hypothesise they need the most transparent influencing. Here are a couple of early draft laws. By the way , anyone claiming to have a method working to strengthen a law is welcome to join in its continual drafting provided they will openly benchmark with other method facilitators in the same rule space. Any comments would be great communally or individually [email protected] , Chris Macrae or during February at the big tent http://groupjazz.com/chautauqua/ 1.1 Law of Identifying & Valuing the networks of organisations with greatest human purpose. We want the 100 biggest organisational networks in the world to be those identified with the most trustworthy and valuable human purposes. We want to know which is which. We want governance of all of these 100 largest organisational networks in ways that transparently sustain the gravity of their communally agreed leadership purpose over time. 2.1 Law of Sustainability & Responsibility We don't want any trustworthy group of people to lose by any policies, interventions or campaigns that use such terms as Sustainability, Responsibility or Reconciliation. Sustainability should be defined as revolving round the open spaces and processes needed so that all of trust their greatest resources (including people lifetimes) to a situation win-win provided they commune transparently and take responsibility for energising the leadership of what they know most about in emotionally literate and open ways _________________________________________ Extract from the timeline in out 1984 book: The Year of Transformation By 2005 the gap in income and expectations between the rich and poor nations was recognised to be man's most dangerous problem. Internet linked television channels in sixty-eight countries invited their viewers to participate in a computerised conference about it, in the form of a series of weekly programmes. Recommendations tapped in by viewers were tried out on a computer model of the world economy. If recommendations were shown by the model to be likely to make the world economic situation worse, they were to be discarded. If recommendations were reported by the model to make the economic situation in poor countries better, they were retained for 'ongoing computer analysis' in the next programme. (Clearly we got the tv networks wrong as the lead reconciliation medium but we stick with our prediction that humanitarian reconciliiation is the must do system work of this decade) * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected], Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
