I continue to be a major fan of OS, and have only one major continuing question 
about its potential limitation: Are abilities that cause/allow some to lead in 
OS well-correlated with the abilities required to lead in a day-to-day 
enterprise?  This question may be a bit similar to whether great political 
candidates also make great political leaders.  J.

-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Harrison Owen
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Hierarchy

Hierarchy for sure gets a bad rap. But as Michael points out, hierarchies show 
up naturally, even -- and maybe most especially  -- in Open Space.
Somebody has the passion, takes the responsibility and some other folks come 
along. I don't know what else you would call it. I call it Hierarchy. But -- 
and this is a BIG BUT -- it is a natural hierarchy totally dependant upon the 
situation, the people involved and the task they are undertaking. Change any of 
those variables and you will have a new organization/hierarchy. I think the 
critical thing is that it is natural, and therefore appropriate to that 
particular situation. The problem with hierarchies that not only get the bad 
rap, but fully deserve that rap, is that they are imposed, arbitrary, and un 
natural. I don't care that the CEO/MD was appointed by the Board and gets the 
big bucks/yen/marks -- that does not make him or her THE leaders. I think that 
went out with the Divine Right of Kings. Or something.

One other problem with Hierarchy may also be that it is (unfortunately) an 
artifact of our graphics. When we draw our organizations they always seem to 
come out looking like an inverted family tree. A real odd tree with the 
branches in the ground and the trunk in the air. No wonder it dies. You would 
too if you had your head 6 feet under! But there are other graphics -- circles, 
spheres -- polycentric spheres in 3-D. Suppose you thought of an organization 
as polycentric spheres all overlapping each other to some degree. And at the 
center of each was the one with the passion who took the responsibility. Now 
tell me which way is up -- and does it really matter?

Harrison

Harrison Owen
7808 River Falls Drive
Potomac, Maryland   20845
Phone 301-365-2093

Open Space Training www.openspaceworld.com Open Space Institute 
www.openspaceworld.org Personal website 
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/hhowen/index.htm
[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives Visit:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html



-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pannwitz, 
Michael M
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 9:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Modesty & 5 Simultaneous Open Spaces

Dear Larry,
the "team" I referred to, is the temporary organization created for the 
os-event (not part of the sponsor) made up of assistants, helpers, facilitator, 
documentation specialists, photographer etc..
This team has or rather gives itself a hierarchy.
Its been a great learning field for me to look at these small "systems" that I 
am part of when involved with facilitating an open space and to tinker with 
"appropriate" structure or hierarchy.
One of the principles that I try to stick to is the notion of the "fully 
present and invisible" facilitator...recent feedback has indicated that 
sometimes the hierarchy designed for the facilitation team actually supports 
this "state" in the eyes of the participants...extending the "fully presnt and 
invisible" mode to all team-members from the experience of the observing 
participants.
My assumption in general is that every system has a hierarchy (more or less 
appropriate) (Ken Wilbur reports of more than 200 hierarchies that he had 
collected in his search for a "fit", eventually coming up with the concept of 
"holons"...noting that "Even those memes that don't recognize hierarchies - 
such as beige or purple - still have hierarchical structures. Everybody seemed 
to have some sort of hierarchy, even those who claimed they didn't.) The reason 
I am diving into this aspect:
Where can I get a more practical and existential learning or remembering 
experience than in my actual praxis?
And:
(referring to Joelles comments about open space and hierarchy) I find it 
productive to look at "hierarchy" as a "given" in all systems and organizations 
without the popular stigma attached to the term (I looked it up in the 
Unabridged and there it is almost exclusively documented with that negative 
stigma attached). What would a system or organization look like in which 
hierarchy is eliminated? Appears, it would no longer exist.
Selforganization, which surfaces especially visible in ost-events or when 
children play,  brings forth hierarchy and structure. Yes, of a kind that has 
no designer! And of a kind that seems the appropriate vessel for creating 
"peace" out of chaos, confusion and conflict.
Ok, what kind of hierarchy is appropriate for the " team" described at the 
beginning that "facilitates" the ost-event?
Or, what kind of hierarchy is appropriate for the subsystem in the organization 
you are working with that has the role of "providing support to tenants and 
staff as they work together to enable the local clusters to make key 
decisionsen"
Greetings from Berlin
mmp



On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:44:02 -0500, Larry Peterson wrote:

>Michael:  You said:
>
>"For me as facilitator working with teams (often groups of  7 or more)
>its proven to be useful to consciously design the "hierarchy" for the
>team and for the interaction of the team with other subsystems
>(catering, publishing, facility management, the sponsors, child-care,
>sound technician, press/radio/television, etc.)  for the open
>space-event (including pre-meetings, setting up the os, the os itself,
>follow up)."
>
>I'm not sure I understand what you mean.  I usually don't get involved
>in "designing" the hierarchy in systems I'm in.





Michael M Pannwitz
boscop
Draisweg 1
12209 Berlin, Germany
FON +49 - 30-772 8000     FAX +49 - 30-773 92 464
www.michaelmpannwitz.de
www.openspace-landschaft.de

An der E-Gruppe "openspacedeutsch" für deutschsprechende open 
space-PraktikerInnen interessiert? Enfach eine mail an mich.

*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
[email protected],
Visit:

http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
[email protected],
Visit:

http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected],
Visit:

http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

Reply via email to