Marei Your post is very interesting. You came to two points that are very important to me, are closelly related, and are not normally referred.
--- Marei Kiele <[email protected]> wrote: > > To me, it all comes down to honesty. Honesty to > myself and to others. The most important point IMO of Argyris and Schon's Model 1 (the prevailing model of acting in our society and organizations) is that we are conditioned to "play games" and not being honest anymore. Learn to behave in Model 2 implies to unlearn the Model 1 that we have been condictioned to follow. I am not talking about respecting "moral rules" or talking (too much) about God, but about "being honest" and "being open" - following Kant's ethical imperative: do to anyother what you would like to see as an universal behaviour. And > That's it for me: > The interactive, learning, conscious open space > organisation is not an > organisation but a community. What do you think? Apart from a small detail (bellow) I agree with you: a living (open, etc) organization will be no longer a "formal organization" but a community. The point I disagree is the expression "conscious open space organization". I don't want a "counscious honest person". I want an "honest person", full stop. Someone that is honest even in the uncoscious. Identically I want "uncousncious open space organizations". Being (only) counsciously honest (open) is NOT ENOUGH. Regards Artur __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
