I think that's right Juan. Just for fun I've done a handful of Open Space Tech meetings without talking about the principles and the law. It works fine.
I am a practictioner of Harrison's challenge to find one more thing not to do in terms of the process, but ironically I find myself adding to my own PRACTICE of Open Space every time I do one. What this means is that instead of spreading my energy into "doing" stuff for the group, I try to sink it deeper into "being" more and more authentic and aligned with my facilitation practice and the group's potential. The law and the principles are the territory like the Rocky Mountains are the territory. Whether or not you draw them on a map is immaterial to their continued existence. Chris On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:26:07 -0700, Juan Luis Walker B. <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Harrison for your profound and challenger reflection. > > My two cents on it: > > If people arrives to the same process and outcomes without mentioning them > the principles and the law, that does not means that they (principles and > law) are a part of the territory and not of the map? > > Juan Luis > > * > * > ========================================================== > [email protected] > ------------------------------ > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, > view the archives of [email protected]: > http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html > > To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: > http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist > -- ------------------------- CHRIS CORRIGAN Consultation - Facilitation Open Space Technology Weblog: http://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot Site: http://www.chriscorrigan.com * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
