OSLIST Digest - 13 Mar 2005 to 14 Mar 2005 (#2005-72)Dear Harrison,

I follow your words: if it works, do it.

Recently I facilitated an OS meeting for 40 people of a company.

The company is in a quite bad moral shape so all the case to help them "wake up 
and walk" was very sensitive.
That was the reason I accepted to use a directed invitation instead of 
voluntary attendence.
These people were not practiced neither in group work nor even to listen to 
each other. 
After the OS introduction they made the agenda. In every time period they could 
put 6 issues on the wall. In almost all of the time periods they have put 5-6 
issues and later they worked on 2 or 3. There were some more burining issues, 
where the number of people were around 30 in the "small" groups.

In one of the periods, when the dedicated time has expired, I suggested to 
choose the next topic, to tell the truth I interfered to finish the discussion. 
Before blaming me for abusing the principles you also have to know that the 
"culture" of communication in this group of people was (is?) that if they think 
of the "bean soup", they talk about "catering" in general.

I could not allow them to realize, they won't get any result to talk paralelly. 

Because of (my) need for control I inserted a feedback time after every two 
time periods, where they could raise new issues and put on those they found 
important.

Before the last period I realized that there will be an issue, that concerned 
almost the whole group. I offered them, if they wish, to moderate this 
discussion. They accepted it so I moderated this session that was planned 1,5 
hour instead of the originally planned 1 hour.

I used the classical nominal group method to collect all the partial issues 
belonging to the main issue. They collected some 40 post-it "issues", belonging 
to the main one. After clarification of the "bean-soups" they made groups of 
the related post-its. Then I suggested to choose one for discussion and take 
home all the others for further discussions.

Since we were close to the end of the whole program, there was no time to open 
the space later, after getting a way of solution for problem solving. 

I showed them a problem solving method for the issue chosen. They could end up 
with specific results and they were happy with the solution. 

I told you this story because of my doubts, how else could I have done it.  


Regards, Gyuri









*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to