HARRISON WROTE, in response to our conversation about TWC: " I understand that this approach could be viewed as my effort to uphold the purity of OST. Perhaps, but I would like to think that it goes deeper than that. From where I sit -- freedom and the necessity of accepting the responsibility of freedom is not the peculiar gift or requirement of OST, it is just a fact of life. From this point of view, OST is only an opportunity to practice what we all have to do anyhow. Some will do all that better than others, some will enjoy it more, and others less -- but it remains a task of our common humanity. The sooner we get on with it, the better."
MY REPLY: I believe it is the work of OS practitioners to uphold the purity of OST, in service not just to the client of the moment but humanity. And, by the way, I agree wholeheartedly with Artur's suspicion that there might be more 'freedom shock' because of the conditions of TWC. TWC seems to catalyze a lot of energy, doesn't it? * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
