Somehow or anotherI allowed myself to become involved in an electronic forum on 
Empowerment. Having followed it for several days I have become convinced the 
the organizer already knows what he thinks empowerment might be and is not 
terribly interested in alternate visions or versions. But before I threw in the 
towel having concluded that it was all pretty much same old, same old. . . I 
did post several responses concerning self-organization and empowerment  -- all 
of which took me to some interesting new places, I thought. If anybody here 
finds it interesting that would go a long way towards redeeming what otherwise 
would be wasted effort. And of course, if there is no interest. . . 

Oh Well :-(


Harrison

****************************************************************

Bob wrote: "Why not treat them ((Students in schools)) (within some limits) as 
equals and as
responsible adults?  It would be school managed jointly by teachers
and pupils, in the style of Harrison's "Open Space"."



There have actually been a number of situations where Open Space has been used 
in schools. (If you are unfamiliar with Open Space check 
http://www.openspaceworld.com/emergent_order.htm ) And the interesting thing is 
that it always seemed to produce useful results. For one thing, so called 
behavioral problems virtually disappeared. Learning, even in very specific 
areas, appeared to be at an all time high -- and perhaps most remarkable, most 
everybody said that it was fun. Imagine that Learning (school) was fun! I might 
take a small issue with Bob -- it was not that the children were treated as 
"responsible adults" -- but rather that everybody was treated as responsible 
(human) beings. I think it would be a mistake, however, to attribute these 
"results" to "Harrison's Open Space." After a number of years' contemplation of 
the conundrum that something so simple could produce such results it has become 
clear to me that it really has nothing to do with the power of Open Space 
Technology -- which as my friends know was the product of two martinis.  The 
operative power is that which underlies Open Space, and indeed virtually 
everything else in the creative cosmos -- the power of self-organization. This 
thought has led me to the outrageous proposition that there is no such thing as 
a non-self-organizing system, albeit there are some mildly deluded people who 
think they did the organizing.

With such monstrous (although I think defensible) jumps of logic, I find myself 
at a place where I think a truly profitable discussion of Empowerment might 
begin. In the first place it is not about designing "Empowerment Systems." 
Rather is about fully appreciating (or maybe just more fully appreciating) the 
nature of the "system" of which we are all a part. I suspect that much of the 
pathology we currently experience in organizations of all sorts and sizes 
(families, companies, countries) derives from the "fact" that we spend a great 
deal of time doing what doesn't need to be done 
(organizing/designing/controlling), while neglecting the essential task, which 
I might call the Care and Feeding of a Self-Organizing system. And instead of 
attempting the creation of new systems, we could take a good hard look at what 
we already are. From this might come an ability to "leverage" the power of 
self-organization, as opposed to attempting to eliminate it -- as in Taking 
Charge (control).

Open Space has become for me a marvelous natural experiment which to date has 
been "run" perhaps 60,000 times in 108 countries that we know about. In short 
the Beta Tests are in -- and the results have been remarkably consistent across 
countries, cultures, and continents. One of these results has been a virtually 
universal experience and expression of personal empowerment -- even (or perhaps 
most particularly) amongst populations that one might considered radically 
disempowered. Could be food for thought.


**********************************************************************************


Dee Hock, whom I know and respect, did a wonderful thing with Visa 
International -- and his experience there became the basis of his book and 
further work with the chaordic organization. Interestingly, however when he and 
others set out to replicate the Chaordic Organization is other situations, 
their success rate has been just about zero. The key, I think, is that they 
attempted the "creation" of the Chaordic Organization as if it were just 
another organization -- they started with Mission, Goals etc. Miles said, 
"Leadership and or some sort of facilitation is needed if "self" organizing is 
to work." I think that is partially right. The fact of the matter is that 
self-organizing systems (by definition) work, or don't work, all by themselves. 
No help needed. However WE may need some help (leadership and facilitation) to 
work effectively with a self organizing system. In the Open Space Experiment, 
Leadership is required to set, or better, to intuit the direction (purpose of 
the Open Space) -- and a facilitator can be helpful with the preparations and 
to get things started.  But once under way, the people (participants) do it all 
by theselves -- no help needed. 

I think this may be significant. Understanding the essential preconditions for 
self organization is very useful. Perhaps we could also call these conditions 
"The Essential Preconditions of Empowerment?" But once started, the level of 
overt intervention drops to basically zero. It would seem that the critical 
mechanisms are so fundamental to our existence that they do not need to be 
explained (we already "know" at a very deep level), nor to they have to be 
tampered with (no management committee). But they (the mechanisms) do have to 
have sufficient space/time in which to function. We have found that the ongoing 
role of the Facilitator in Open Space is all about "Holding Space" which is 
much more about Being than Doing. And when things get a little bumpy (lots of 
chaos, confusion and conflict) the appropriate response is actually to open 
more space. To an outsider this often appears to be counter-intuitive at best 
and probably irresponsible, immoral, and wrong. After all, we have all been 
trained that our "job" is to fix things up. 

 

Harrison  



Harrison Owen
7808 River Falls Dr.
Potomac, MD  20854
USA
301-365-2093
207-763-3261 (summer)
website www.openspaceworld.com


*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to