Interesting topic... form exists as long as there is life ... we create form in as many ways as we choose... and... ritual is, in my mind, only of value if there is a deeper understanding of what is behind the ritual.... call it spirit, call it nature, call it unity... if one is just 'going through the motions' of a ritual then it has lost its sense of meaning/purpose... so if you find meaning/purpose in ALL things, then no matter what the form or ritual can you come to the same place? Or do some forms/rituals lend themselves more easily to coming together? Certainly the circle form has been around in many cultures for centuries...
Just random thoughts floating through...
Nancy
From: Scott Willard <[email protected]>
Reply-To: OSLIST <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Imposed Structure, Self-Organisation, Ritual
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:42:26 -0700
One thing that I would add to the definition of ritual is that ritual is all about spirit. I just finished reading The Healing Wisdom of Africa- great book. I believe it was by P.M. Some' and he states very clearly that ritual is an opportunity for spirit to impact the lives of the observant. To me, that's what happens in OST. One idea sparks the room and the market place, conversations, evening news act as litany that welcomes the spirit of unity and community to emerge.Writing this, I wonder about what happens after folks leave the room. While in the ritual space of OST a pseudo community is formed. Do folks have experience in fostering community once the meeting is closed and folks go back to their homes? I see the meetings that happen all over the world, where folks go back time after time for OS on OS, but what about smaller scale scenario's?Scott Willard
Affinity Consulting Group
affinity-scottwillard.com
----- Original Message ----
From: Andrew Ballance <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:45:56 AM
Subject: Imposed Structure, Self-Organisation, Ritual
* * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslistHi again!
On the subject of my writing.. When it rains, it pours.. I didn't want to clutter the previous post with too much reflection and interpretation. [If you didn't read the previous post, you need to, or you might not know where this is coming from]
There appeared to be a polarity at play here, between order and chaos, or between imposed structure and self-organisation, something that the chaordic thinkers have probably already chanced upon. To paraphrase what some of the participants said, "Why do we need Open Space? Surely we can just decide to be free, and have whatever conversations matter, that's our decision and responsibility, and if anyone needs some help doing that, I'm here to help." This is an important point: Open Space is a structure. To my mind, though, there is an important dimension to it: it is a ritual structure. Rituals allow us to say or do things that don't normally come out in everyday conversation, they set the tone and say it's ok to express yourself now in a particular way.
There are two definitions of ritual that I find quite interesting in this context:
- any practice or pattern of behavior regularly performed in a set manner
- a prescribed code of behavior regulating social conduct, as that exemplified by the raising of one's hat or the shaking of hands in greeting
It's clear to me that OS already is the first of these. That's great, because that's the way we get results, or rather that's the way in which we as facilitators regular social conduct for a period of time. But what about that word 'prescribed'? What do you think of that? What happens if it is prescribed? By whom? If it's not by anyone in particular, then that means OS is accepted practice. But as accepted (expected?) practice.. does that limit its effectiveness? Is that no longer a structure that generates energy, but one that feels like an imposition and so acts as a dampener?
OK, enough philosophising for one day. Not that I expect we can come to an answer to these questions, I'd be interested to hear what other people think about OS as ritual?
Andrew
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos. * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
