I have in the past done a useful convergence within the confines of an organization's strategic plan, and I think it was inspired by Michael Pannwitz.
Basically the client said that the 30 people in the room could host discussions on anything they wanted to, but if they wanted their proposals or ideas included in the strategic plan, they had to fit into one of five categories (in this case something like funding, policy, human resources, service delivery and government relations). In practice, this was very simple. As the results from each conversation were typed up, conveners placed them on the news wall under one of those five headings. There was only one conversation that fell outside of those five headings, and it was about some internal communication issue which was quickly resolved. The next day, the room was divided into five zones and the people came back, choose the topics they wanted to work on and set to work making sense of all of the previous day's conversations within their topic area. The principles and the law remained in effect of course. They were given an assignment in each area to produce proposals with resource implications for inclusion in the plan, proposals which would have to be approved by the Board. At the end of the day we heard back on the proposals, and everyone basically agreed with what was going forward. I'm pretty sure the Board rubber stamped everything, the quality of the ideas were great and people had taken the time to think them through. Rather than keeping people away from the funds in the organization, the Board actually let people put their hands on the resources and use them to shape the plan. Of course the people were incredibly responsible with their own money and time, and we got a good plan out of the deal. So it's possible to provide a channel into which ideas can be guided and still remain open. People in the organization were free to talk about anything they wanted to and the STILL chose to focus on the best interest of the organization. Not a surprise to me at all. Passion and responsibility do marvelous things. Cheers, Chris On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Diane Gibeault <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael, > > > > I agree with you that we rarely have surprises on priorities the group > proposes after its discussions but I have seen cases where there were. In > most case, the feedback from the leaders I was suggesting when the > priorities are announced, is more to create the safe space before we reopen > space for action….just like the host creates that safe space at the very > beginning of the OS by speaking to the goal, givens if any, leadership's > commitment and encouraging creative thinking. At convergence, this same > message is focused on confirming the safe space around the priorities, and > encouraging creative and open thinking again, this time for actions. > > > > I think Harrison our approaches are not different but complementary. I > also have that very serious conversations with the sponsor before the OS is > even considered, ensuring there is openness to go beyond what exists and > keeping givens to a minimum. That's essential in setting the stage for that > safe space. > > > > Making the safe space apparent again just before the rubber hits the road > – pardon the road metaphor - I think is helpful. For participants to hear > that the leadership is fully on board before they start concretely > committing their precious time and energy in real work on the proposed > priorities, is about creating a safe space. In many organizations, the > support of the leadership the day after the meeting is not a given. Even if > the leaders have committed to the facilitator, committing publicly to the > entire organization when the collective will has been expressed openly on > priorities, increases significantly that building of trust and the chances > of that support happening. > > > > To sum it up, I feel the words safe, trust and commitment reflect more the > intent of this leadership statement at convergence than control. How it is > done matters a lot, that's for sure and that's where again the facilitator > can prepare leaders as to their message approach. > > > > Diane > > > > > * * ========================================================== > [email protected] ------------------------------ To > subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of > [email protected]: > http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about > OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist -- CHRIS CORRIGAN Facilitation - Training - Process Design Open Space Technology Weblog: http://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot Site: http://www.chriscorrigan.com Principal, Harvest Moon Consultants, Ltd. http://www.harvestmoonconsultants.com * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
