Dear Lisa, dear Artur...
basically, Lisas notes reflect my experience with about 200 os events
over the last 14 years.
In the early days of my practice I spoke quite a bit about "Open Space"
(how it came about, the originator, etc.).
For some time now, I might mention "Open Space" once (if you look at
the introduction which is part of the book "Meine open space Praxis" I
pick up on "Open Space" in response to something the sponsor/my client
said in his remarks...in this case he mentioned that Open Space is also
fun).
There always are a few sentences in the invitation to the event about
OST, however.
Also, I say practically nothing about the "Theme" but encourage the
sponsor/my client to do a bit of that in his "Welcome" (where he
actually opens the space with traditional welcoming words, saying
something about the Theme and, most importantly, talks a bit about his
own passion...no more than 5 minutes for all of that).
And I also "explain" or rather illustrate each principle, the law, the
bumble bees, the butterfly in my words...
All this is done to reduce the time before the participants start to act
themselves...and I discovered over the years that the simpler, shorter,
more matter-of-fact... the introduction became, the easier it seemed for
the participants to get "into the spirit" , forget about the
facilitator, do their thing...and in my observation expanded the
possibilities for the forces of selforganisation to do its thing (which,
I find, is not the same as the apparent self-organizing mode the
participants get into).
On first reading, I was comfortable about what you said about "training"
and that Open Space meetings are not trainings. And then I remember how
I used to do "trainings" twenty years ago and how I facilitate trainings
for Open Space Technology these days... and that is certainly vastly
different from the "traditional" trainigs I used to do. Perhaps this is
a different topic but briefly, in OST trainings I am involved in there
is absolutely no "explaining" on my part (participants explain it to
themselves and to each other, I suppose)... I tell participants before
the training that there is no way to learn or teach OST but, at best, it
can be "remembered"... and that takes about 5 days.
Greetings from Berlin
mmp
Lisa Heft wrote:
Hi, Artur -
Regarding the outdoor experiences the day before an Open Space: many
things can happen the day before an Open Space. But as Open Space
delivers intimate passionate discussion, relationship-building, a sense
of community or team, energetic interchange and even laughter - I not
only see no reason to design in preliminary activities *but* have
actually seen an Open Space suffer after these. And I have seen the
same as Harrison noted - participants have often said 'why didn't you
give us more time for our work / play / discussion in Open Space - we
could have used it'.
This includes introduction / warm-up / 'icebreaker' activities. Even
going around in a circle hearing what everyone's name and title is seems
to be taking up valuable time for participants - they always say how
they came to know and remember each other much more deeply because of
their shared interests and spirited discussions in the Open Space and
that a traditional introduction both is hard to remember plus can often
set up assumptions about who is supposedly who.
Regarding the introduction / explanation of Open Space - I feel strongly
that one should explain the principles and law BEFORE opening up the
floor for topics / agenda co-creation.
Because you are explaining / inviting a different way of being. You are
explaining when you explain principles and law that everything is
possible, including visiting multiple discussions during a single session.
You are letting people know to follow the energy of the conversations
rather than their pre-conceived agendas.
And you are also letting people know that even if one person comes that
is exactly the amazing perfect thing - they can write in silence and
contribute even if they have a completely different way of thinking.
The explanation of principles and laws (not just the reading of the text
on the posters) is one of the essential invitations in Open Space, I
believe.
Also: your client said that they do that certain way (explaining only
each thing as needed) for ***trainings****.
That is a very good way to do a training.
Open Space meetings are not trainings.
A very important difference for design, explanation, dynamics,
information the participants need for their self-organized work,
objectives, outcomes and more. Right?
Lisa
*
/
Lisa Heft
/
*
Consultant, Facilitator, Educator
*Opening Space*
lisah...@openingspace.net <mailto:lisah...@openingspace.net>
On Nov 13, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Artur Silva wrote:
Thanks for your answer(s), Harrison.
And have you (ou others) any comments on my point 2 (the possible
two-step opening)?
Rgds
Artur
* * ==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To
subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about
OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
--
Michael M Pannwitz, boscop eg
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49-30-772 8000
mmpa...@boscop.org
www.boscop.org
Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 412 resident Open
Space Workers in 71 countries working in a total of 141 countries worldwide
Have a look:
www.openspaceworldmap.org
*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
