Dear Christine,
sounds like a pretty regular Open Space event, grand!
And you in charge of "animation" (as it says here
http://forum-ouvert-mediation.dyndns.org/Contributions.htm

The conflicts you mention as being virulent in the community are one of
the prerequisites for the unfolding of selforganisation... without them
it might have been less productive and less magic!

I do hope you and all of us will be in many more os events like the one
you just had,

Greetings from Berlin
mmp



On 01.03.2011 22:13, christine koehler wrote:
Dear all,

It has been a great experience !

Till the very last day before the event, tension has been palpable :
articles  published condemning not only the goal, but also  the event,
people taking their organization out of the planning commitee... A few
supporting but low voices still came out and finally 130 people had
subscribed on the 150 expected..  I wonder how many people there would
have been if this community had not been in conflict...

On the morning of the event, I was tensed, so I went out for a walk a
bit before the start.While walking, I experienced suddenly a deep
shivering, and then I was quiet, realizing   that I had only to trust
the process. Just before going back into the sportshall, I got a
phonecall : the sponsor  has just received the news that a deputy was
coming, and wanted to know when this man could talk... So he talk: 2 mn
after the sponsor's introduction ;-) And then I started talking.
Everything went fine, I just forgot a few nimor details. Then people
started announcing topics : rythm of this group was 2-3 pause then 2-3
pause and again 1 or 2 topics then pause. All important and disturbing
subjects came out.They  decided to combine many topics, and when
discussions began, there were mainly bigs groups, and only 1 or 2 whith
less then 10 people. This kept true during the whole event. Around
midday, I got a few remarks asking for more structure (interestingly
from people I would not have expected to)  ;-). But then people
self-organized again and went back to their groups, and all conveners
gathered to the newsroom to type their reports. Newsroom has been a very
active point during all the event, with typing and reading the reports
and correcting them and discussing them etc.. people looked for accuracy
of reports !
On the second day, there were more bumblebees and many feedbacks of
great informal conversations. People were very busy all the time, and 35
topics were documented, creating a 126 pages report of impressive quality.
Action planning gave 11 projects, and 9 were actively discussed.
Sponsor was amazed : this was the first time for years and years  that
real cooperation had taken place between all those organizations that
were usually either competing or in conflict, and all projects were of
great interest for the whole community ( definition of central
concepts,  organization, communication, ethics, training etc..)

Now there are a few articles coming out, I hear the words of "magic" and
people start discussing of what they will do from all this..
There should be some pictures coming soon here
<http://forum-ouvert-mediation.dyndns.org/index_fichiers/Page331.htm>

So magic happened
It always works
;-)
Christine

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:40 PM, christine koehler <chris.alice.ko
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Dear all,

    You really are an amazing community, thank you so much for all your
    answers and mark of support !

    Amazing Lisa, you got it all. Indeed the big issue is about to
    professionnalize or not, and the community is strongly divided about
    the question. And indeed stated as it is, it's an outcome...Thanks
    so much for this.
    You also helped me clarify the importance of the Book of
    Proceedings, which I had not seen so clearly. You're right , and I
    just suggested the sponsor that it be the goal of the OS (luckily
    all has been organized to make it feasible).
    I told them that it would be their gift to the community, as a thank
    you for all participants trusting them and making them the gift of
    their presence to this OS.Let's see what they say.

    Thank you all for underlying that words must not become barriers,
    and that change can be made, even at the very end.

    Catherine, thanks for your suggestion to make my hat obvious. While
    I had made it clear from the very beginning with the sponsor that I
    was there as the facilitator and not mediator (in the beginning they
    suggested that we present the OS as a mediation, and that I woud be
    the mediator, so I had to let them understand that it was not a good
    idea ;-)), it may not be clear for all participants.
    So at the beginning of my introduction I'll take off my mediator's
    badge (the one I use at Court) that I will have put on my clothing
    on purpose. I like this idea ;-)
    Thanks also for advising me to have a look at Peggy's introduction.
    I'll look for it.

    Diane, thanks you for your advice. Indeed, like Michael & the Boscop
    team  showed me so often,  I also believe that facilitating an OS
    event is a team work, and my assistant for this event is a wonderful
    person that you trained recently in Belgium, Jocelyne. I am
    confident she will handle perfectly all last time logistical details
    and problems (which I already handled to her last Thursday to be
    able to concentrate on facilitation).

    Christian, I love the citation of William Blake on your website :
    "there are things known and there are things unknown, and in between
    there are doors". I may say add it to my introduction ;-)

    Christine, thanks for the picture. Indeed I see yout point ;-)

    My learnings here these days ;
    Being part of the system is definitely not the right place for a
    facilitator. It prevents from seing obvious facts.
    Here, being part of the system and knowing the people, I was not
    willing to see where the unconscious control was (although I could
    feel it, I could not point it).

    My comprehension of the role of the facilitator has taken me, I
    think, a step further. I had seen that some of you position
    themselves as  going with the participants through the process, and
    only warrant of the process, while others were what I would call
    "champions" of dialogue (or other concept like self organizing or
    emargence or peace., as I think that it depends strongly of who you
    are) and would have  an "appealing"  introduction or closing. Up to
    now I was belonging to the first category, as I trust the process,
    but was no trusting myself 100% probably. Maybe it may change...I'll
    let you know ;-)



    Thank you SO MUCH Suzanne, Thomas, Steve, Phelim, Chris, Ria, Elaine
    and you all. I'll open space at 9am next Thursday till Friday
    5.30pm. I already feel you are with me, and it helps !

    Christine




--
Christine Koehler
Médiateur
Créatrice d'espaces de dialogue et de coopération
www.christinekoehler.com <http://www.christinekoehler.com>
Tel : 06 13 28 71 38

Twitter <http://twitter.com/Mediateur_>

* * ==========================================================
[email protected] ------------------------------ To
subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
[email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about
OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

--
Second European Open Space Learning Exchange, Italy, May 17-20, 2011!
Curious? Take a look here:
http://boscop.org/events/636
Number of registration as of February 27: 32 from all over Europe and
more coming in!


Michael M Pannwitz, boscop eg
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49-30-772 8000
[email protected]
www.boscop.org

*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to