I think I’ve found the secret. It is not so much what I said – but what we all 
said which was “carried along” as a continuation of the thread. So the answer 
is Delete, Delete, Delete. 

 

Maybe?

 

Harrison

 

 

 

Jorge – Welcome! And don’t stay away so long!!

 

Two principles about “time.” You’re right! But are both necessary? I thought so 
at the time (bad pun J). The principles (all of them) popped into my head over 
a period of years as I noticed the strange things that happened in Open Space – 
and particularly the strange things that appeared to perplex people. I found 
myself enunciating the principles as a way of pointing out what they were 
likely to run into and to suggest that, strange as it might seem, everything 
would work out just fine. 

 

The first Principle should make the point. Everybody was always concerned that 
the “right” people come to a meeting. Usually they meant those people with the 
political position, the appropriate authority, or the right expertise. The 
experience, however, went in a very different direction. Often it seemed like 
that even if NONE of the “right” people showed up still very useful things 
happened. I confess it took me a while to figure out why that might be true – 
but  from the start, it just seemed like a fact of life. Counter-intuitive as 
it might seem, “Whoever comes is the right people.”

 

The two “time” Principles showed up for similar reasons. Obviously they are 
both about time, but very different sorts of time. There is “beginning” time 
and “ending” time. And people seemed very concerned about each, but for 
different reasons. I noticed that folks were often sweating the fact that we 
might not start “on time.” But I also noticed that whenever we started, 
everything seemed to work out just fine – hence, “Whenever it starts is the 
right time.”

 

Ending time is a different creature. And most people just really don’t want to 
talk about it. In extreme situations that sort of time is called “death.” But 
even in more proximate situations, “ending” is something we would rather not 
confront. Hopefully, things will just go on forever. But  the don’t! All of 
this becomes quite difficult when we spend a lot of time and effort keeping 
something going, when in fact it is already ended. Dead so to speak. Companies 
that have seen better days and should just retire from the field of battle with 
a good funeral just keep plugging away, wasting massive amounts of human energy 
and Spirit. In truth they would do everybody a favor, themselves included, if 
they would just admit the obvious, It’s over! Hence the Principle: “When it is 
over, it’s over.”

 

There is really nothing very arcane and deep theory about these 5 Principles. 
Just funny things I’ve noticed that sometimes seem to get in people’s way as 
they move in Open Space. The Principles don’t actually change a thing. What’s 
going to happen will. But when folks have a “heads-up” it seems to make it a 
little easier for them.

 

Harrison

 

Harrison Owen

7808 River Falls Dr.

Potomac, MD 20854

USA

Phone 301-365-2093

www.openspaceworld.com

www.ho-image.com (Personal Website)

To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of OSLIST Go 
to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jorge amigo
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:11 AM
To: 'Jorge amigo'; 'World wide Open Space Technology email list'
Subject: Re: [OSList] Welcome to the 5th principle in order to remain 4

 

Dear community

I would like to delve a little deeper on the idea that I have raised with the 
title "Welcome the 5th principle in order to remain 4”.

First, tell you I appreciate and value the open space is OSLIST virtual. I am 
basically a peripheral participant OSLIST. Very few times I've written 
something, but I am a legitimate peripheral to live in freedom and 
responsibility to participate from time to time on subjects that interest me. 
And this has been the case. The appearance of the reflections and comments on 
the 5 th Principle has interested me. I believe that the talks that have 
emerged on this new principle have been a great contribution to cultivate the 
spirit of the OS, for to flourish his essence.
The foundations for the incorporation of this new principle seem solid and have 
been exhibited with clarity by Harrison Owen and others. This new principle, - 
which has always been there-, makes me much sense incorporate it into the 
opening of OS, because it provides an essential distinction to the experience 
of the spirit of the OS. 

But it was his appearance that made me take a fresh look to each of the other 
Principles. I wondered what was the equivalent contribution of each one, which 
led me to review the focus and the ideas associated with each. 
The focus of the first principle is people. The recognition that whatever is 
done will be done by people who are there. In our practice as facilitators, 
with my dear friend Juan Luis, enunciated this principle as "somos los que 
estamos, estamos los que somos" an expression that our culture promotes the 
idea that those are the best people to carry out the task . This focus responds 
to the who / whom 
The focus of the second, the action is, what is happening, what people do, the 
experience of what I will do - we will do, I do - we do, I did – we did. The 
lived process, the successful product. It responds to what

For me, the focus of the third and fourth principle is only one, is time. 
Present as one principle helps to raise awareness of the relationship we have 
with time. From the experience of time to create, to learn. To start and 
finish. The title of this merger could be "when it starts, it starts, When it 
is over, it is over." This focus responds to when 

And there is the new principle, which brings the experience of space itself. 
The place of meeting, whatever, will always be an appropriate place. There is 
the worry about whether he could be in a better place, once there, this is the 
right place. Responds to where. 
That's how I came to wonder the idea of ​​welcoming the principle 5 in order to 
remain 4. 
But also in terms of form, I like the idea of ​​4 to 5 Principles. I think four 
is more harmonious with the circle of the OS figure. Shape 4 shows key 
dimensions of life: the 4 cardinal points, the 4 seasons, the 4 basic elements 
and others. Finally, also, that less is more. 
But maybe I'm not seeing something important to justify the two principles 
associated with the time necessary and useful to present them separately. If 
so, please ask me what they indicate. 
OS has been effective so far as it is and I believe that the Principles are 4 
or 5, does not add anything significant. In any case, try my idea in the next 
OS to provide. 

Finally, reflect on the subject I have found attractive, I recreated the spirit 
of OS. 
A hug for everyone and we hope in Chile, the right place for the next Wosonos. 
Jorge Amigo 

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to