Hello dear oslist community I think about introducing distributed not-taking for sessions so that the responsibility of notes is in the hands of every participant and not the participant appointed session transcriber as is the general structured meeting practice. I long for an opening in the passion and responsibility for the written notes as well as the spoken word.
As I read about some participation content begin lost by transcribers and experiencing it for my self, I think about the documentation design style and the call by some to have scribes at each group. Having scribes at groups makes my face expression wrinkle a little and I think of an alternative solution based on the responsibility and passion of every member. What if everyone could dot down there own contributions or ask a fellow in the discussion to dot down there contributions if that is there need. This way the responsibility of not-taking is distributed, and half, if not all present take notes to there contributions. But then we have a problem when all the different notes enter the computers, the complexity of adding several documents as one discussion will be like a discussion in the lists or some different beast. I imagen that this idea has especially had some fieald time in the hads of multi-language gathering facilitators. My vision is a shared and individual responsibility for session note-taking without the use of session selected representative for the role. I ask about your experiences with this idea of distributed documentation for each session and the solutions you have identified. with love from Iceland Kári -- Kári Gunnarsson [email protected] gsm: +354 8645189
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
