Marie – Doubtless there have been multiple ups and downs along our pathway of 
evolving consciousness. But optimist that I am, I persist in the odd notion 
that some very interesting things have happened. But not always according to 
our plan.J So on particularly bad days (you get to name your favorites) I find 
it useful to reflect on the fact that given all the terrible things that have 
happened, could have happened, might have happened – isn’t it wonderful that we 
are still here to complain about how bad things have gotten? And last time I 
checked I haven’t heard of too many folks who are longing for the good old days 
out in The Cave.

 

Harrison

 

Harrison Owen

7808 River Falls Dr.

Potomac, MD 20854

USA

 

189 Beaucaire Ave. (summer)

Camden, Maine 04843

 

Phone 301-365-2093

(summer)  207-763-3261

 

www.openspaceworld.com 

www.ho-image.com (Personal Website)

To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of OSLIST Go 
to: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org> 
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marie Ann Östlund
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 6:51 PM
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] self-organization

 

Hi Paul,

 

Thank you for that. I'm not well versed in these theories but I know that 
Habermas have used Piaget's theory of human evolution to describe evolution of 
human society. What I find attractive with his view is his emphasis on 
communication as the motor of evolution - human conciousness evolves through 
interaction with others and become less egoistic or self-centred. However, this 
evolution is not inevitable. That's why Habermas is so concerned with the 
communicative side of society. It is through our interaction with others that 
our self-centredness is challenged and hopefully modified.

 

Others have challenged the view that it's possible to compare the evolution of 
consciousness - from childhood to youth - with the evolution of society. Still 
others don't agree with Piaget's theory (within his field) but I don't know 
their objections. 

 

But if we use the idea that evolution of consciousness means becoming less 
self-centred and more conscious of others - are we sure that human society is 
evolving? And if we are, is it from a historical low-point (20th century wasn't 
particularly wonderful, considering the WWs, Cold War etc.) or has it 
progressed steadily from time immemorial? From what historical point do we take 
our measure? From where, which continent, and what are we measuring? 

 

I'm conscious that I'm questioning some commonly held assumptions, and you 
might find it ridiculous of me to do so. But that's what fools are for :)

 

Marie Ann 

 

Skickat från min iPhone


6 jan 2014 kl. 22:38 skrev Paul Nunesdea <[email protected]>:

Hi Marie Ann, 

 

I apologise if interrupting an otherwise interesting conversation here with but 
when you ask 

interested to know what you base your idea that human consciousness has 
"clearly evolved". :)

 

Piaget and others have written about how human consciousness evolves from birth 
to adult life.

 

Most of this knowledge derives from cheer observation of small child's 
behaviour.

 

If you extrapolate this findings to our own evolution as a species wouldn't it 
be natural that this same self-developing path applies to this other dimension 
of 'being human'?

 

Happy new year!!

 

>From my iPad


On 06/01/2014, at 18:02, Marie Ann Östlund <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Paul,

I do agree that Open Space is a form of organising - a beautiful and eloquent 
one, as you say. If we bring 200 people in a room without any set up, 
principles, law, facilitator etc, it most probably be quite a different meeting 
than an Open Space meeting. So yes, a form of organising.

Interesting view on self-organising. I hear what you're saying, and I think 
many esoterically inclined on the list would agree. I'm esoterically inclined, 
but don't quite agree. But that's not the point. This discussion helps me 
understand how some of you define and view self-organisation, and why you talk 
about it in the way you do. 

I'd be interested to know what you base your idea that human consciousness has 
"clearly evolved". :)

Marie Ann

 

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:30 AM, paul levy <[email protected]> wrote:

HI Marie

 

I'm suggesting quite the opposite. Truth doesn't always elude us because we are 
both tiny and universal.

 

Open Space is a form of organisation. It is a minimally structured process that 
enables BOTH selves and the SELF to organise.

 

Self-organisation is the act of the self, organising. The self is microcosmic, 
realised in the emergent, incarnated individual self, and macrocosmic in the 
holism (whole-ism) of the universe. Diversity lies in between, different levels 
and qualities of consciousness.

 

As consciousness in our human selves has clearly been evolving, we've gone 
through various stages. Egoism has tended to both harden the self and lead to 
overstructure as those selves attempt to enclose and gain control over nature. 
Minimal structuring and organisation is an antidote to overstructure. Open 
Space Technology is such a minimal structure. And, oh yes, a structure it is. A 
beautiful, eloquent one.

 

Paul

 

On 2 January 2014 23:37, Marie Ann Östlund <[email protected]> wrote:

Thank you Paul. I'm not sure how to respond or if I need to. :)

Truth with always elude us since we're tiny. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't 
try to understand. And as you say: "Perhaps it's us self-organising so the self 
might know it" That's what I'm suggesting. Our experiences might help us 
towards some more coherence.

 

Marie Ann

 

 

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:09 PM, paul levy <[email protected]> wrote:

Of course, all of these wonderful statements about what self-organisation is, 
are organising statements !

 

Open Space Technology itself, minimal as it is, is an organising process.

 

I do enjoy lazy philosophy. It's part of our mysterious humanity. And making 
statements about self-organisation is like trying to bite your own teeth. You 
can't grasp this particular spiritual feather because you are the feather, the 
wind, the blowing and even the story of it.

 

Though, perhaps the "self" in self-organisation really does refer to the human 
self.

 

The eye is formed by the light, for the light. Perhaps it's us self-organising 
so the self might know it.

 

Happy New Year

 

Paul Levy



On Monday, 30 December 2013, Daniel Mezick wrote:

Such a rich topic! Thanks to Marie Ann Östlund for opening this topic.

I am compelled to add the following words (verbatim) from RIGHTS OF MAN, by 
Thomas Paine. The book is quite an interesting read for folks like us. It tends 
to confirm and join with all of Harrison's key points. 

My favorite quote in the book: 
"...society performs for itself almost everything that is ascribed to 
government."

When he says [society] in the text, he means groups to people who are 
self-organizing, according to natural propensity.

The whole book is here, for free:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3742/3742-h/3742-h.htm#link2H_4_0007

Quoting below, from this specific section:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3742/3742-h/3742-h.htm#link2HCH0001

Will you pardon my forwardness? I've taken the liberty of bolding a few words 
for emphasis:

"So far is it from being true, as has been pretended, that the abolition of any 
formal government is the dissolution of society, that it acts by a contrary 
impulse, and brings the latter the closer together. All that part of its 
organisation which it had committed to its government, devolves again upon 
itself, and acts through its medium. When men, as well from natural instinct as 
from reciprocal benefits, have habituated themselves to social and civilised 
life, there is always enough of its principles in practice to carry them 
through any changes they may find necessary or convenient to make in their 
government. In short, man is so naturally a creature of society that it is 
almost impossible to put him out of it. 

"Formal government makes but a small part of civilised life; and when even the 
best that human wisdom can devise is established, it is a thing more in name 
and idea than in fact. It is to the great and fundamental principles of society 
and civilisation—to the common usage universally consented to, and mutually and 
reciprocally maintained—to the unceasing circulation of interest, which, 
passing through its million channels, invigorates the whole mass of civilised 
man—it is to these things, infinitely more than to anything which even the best 
instituted government can perform, that the safety and prosperity of the 
individual and of the whole depends. 

"The more perfect civilisation is, the less occasion has it for government, 
because the more does it regulate its own affairs, and govern itself; but so 
contrary is the practice of old governments to the reason of the case, that the 
expenses of them increase in the proportion they ought to diminish. It is but 
few general laws that civilised life requires, and those of such common 
usefulness, that whether they are enforced by the forms of government or not, 
the effect will be nearly the same. If we consider what the principles are that 
first condense men into society, and what are the motives that regulate their 
mutual intercourse afterwards, we shall find, by the time we arrive at what is 
called government, that nearly the whole of the business is performed by the 
natural operation of the parts upon each other. 

"Man, with respect to all those matters, is more a creature of consistency than 
he is aware, or than governments would wish him to believe. All the great laws 
of society are laws of nature. Those of trade and commerce, whether with 
respect to the intercourse of individuals or of nations, are laws of mutual and 
reciprocal interest. They are followed and obeyed, because it is the interest 
of the parties so to do, and not on account of any formal laws their 
governments may impose or interpose. 


***






On 12/30/13 11:10 AM, Harrison Owen wrote:

Marie – I think you have it just right. But maybe you are making things a 
little too complicated, and working a bit too hard. In my simple mind, things 
look like this. First: All systems are self organizing, even those we think we 
organize. Second: Organizing a self organizing system is not only an oxymoron, 
but stupid – especially when the system can do a better job all by itself. 
Third: Whenever we try to organize a self-organizing system, we inevitably get 
it wrong. Our efforts are “clunky.” Even though it may look great on paper, our 
efforts are never subtle or flexible (agile) enough. Fourth: Open Space is 
simply an invitation to self organize. In other words it is simply an 
invitation to be and do what we are. The fact that it works as it does has 
nothing to do with our knowing any philosophy, principles, practices... It 
works as it has for 13.7 billion years, long before we arrived on the scene, 
all without our help and assistance. Fifth: the real value of OST is as a 
training program enabling us to experience consciously and intentionally what 
all too often passes by unnoticed – Life. It is also a marvelous laboratory in 
which we can learn more about our natural state. And oh yes – all the 
principles, philosophies, practices, etc are fun, interesting, and useful to 
the extent that they help us to understand with greater clarity what is really 
going on. But at the end of the day they really don’t change a thing. I think.

 

ho 

 

Harrison Owen

7808 River Falls Dr.

Potomac, MD 20854

USA

 

189 Beaucaire Ave. (summer)

Camden, Maine 04843

 

Phone 301-365-2093

(summer)  207-763-3261

 

www.openspaceworld.com <http://www.openspaceworld.com%20>  

www.ho-image.com <http://www.ho-image.com%20>  (Personal Website)

To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of OSLIST Go 
to:

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
 
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

-- 

Daniel Mezick, President

New Technology Solutions Inc.

(203) 915 7248 <tel:(203)%20915%207248>  (cell)

Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/> . Blog <http://newtechusa.net/blog/> . 
Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/> . 

Examine my new book:  The Culture Game  
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/> : Tools for the Agile 
Manager.

Explore Agile Team Training 
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/>  and Coaching. 
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/> 

Explore the Agile Boston  <http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/> Community. 


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to