Hi Daniel You are welcome.
My tiered English was not at it best in the first post, but I hope the spellchecker managed to make my writing readable. Well there is always the purpose of the occasion and how it plays out. I would now be interested how different participatory processes work for individuals and compare it to Belbin team roles or the personality psychology of the five scales: Cautious-inventive; Organized-careless; Energetic-reserved; Analytical-compassionate; and Confident-nervous. But what to measure for is of-course up to the purpose of our survey. What would be our next step in this topic offering. In openness, Kári the group coach On 20 November 2014 14:06, Daniel Mezick via OSList < oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote: > Hi Kári, > > Thank you for making your proposals. They are very interesting! > > Daniel > > > On 11/20/14 6:34 AM, Kári Gunnarsson via OSList wrote: > > There is an invitation to some scientific rigor for our beloved > technology. I propose we accept this invitation as a communal effort. An > idea for a trial design would be to collect survey data where the nuances > of the lived experiences would be teased out, survey data collected by > cooperation among our grand Institutes and access given to unaffiliated > researchers to collect some understandings and make their own conclusions > in publishable science papers. It will probably be far too difficult, even > impossible the task of building of such survey database along with the > standardized questioners. And the time to build it was sometime long ago, > we are long past out do time. There is urgency to this task. But do we have > to do it? Well, is there a real need for this approach? I think we can host > this endeavor, even try to find a design that allows for a Double-blinded > rigor. My vision is that we design standardize and publish a survey that we > then allow events to use to collect data for us, data that we then give to > researchers where they can use it for their publishing needs. There is also > the Pandora’s Box of issues and opportunities. It looks like it is a topic > ripe for an open space, "be prepared to be surprised". > > The new late majority folks are going for the theme of „participatory > processes“ and request an overview over the landscape. It is the new > gathering pole and open space is central for me in this arena as it is less > controlling that other processes. Perhaps tour rigor should be part of a > broader sense of analyses under the more general heading of participatory > processes. > > But perhaps when we look at Open Space, then we must use the same type of > analyses as when we look at research approaches, like when we look at the > difference on Double-blinded procedure done by WHR Rivers > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._H._R._Rivers and earlier research > procedures. > > A resent story on "time to think", two weeks ago I facilitated a short 3 > hour open space for a local branch of a political on their internal > operations. There were also a lot of other things happening before and > after the conversation part of the program, some football fans even > disappeared during the open space to see the ongoing game. Personally I > was happy that we had the lunch before the open space, I took some time for > reflection and thinking about the possible dream future and topics that > make us show up for the work. Then reflection and lunch was served, a lot > of chatter during the soup lunch, then back to the introduction of > principles … “Whatever happens is the only thing that could have, be > prepared to be surprised!”… democracy of the feet / the law of mobility, > the bugs and what they give us. Then brake for topics. … It was short > time and a lot of conflict of attention by the sponsors for the other parts > of the day program, but it worked out well. The passion for work and the > freedom of this technology opened for topics and responsibility that had > previously been submerged by the tyranny of long speeches and lectures. > Give a little time and then open up some space, works each time given the > preconditions. > > In openness, > Kári the group coach > > > > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click > below:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > > > -- > > Daniel Mezick, President > > New Technology Solutions Inc. > > (203) 915 7248 (cell) > > Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog > <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter > <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>. > > Examine my new book: The Culture Game > <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the Agile > Manager. > > Explore Agile Team Training > <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching. > <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/> > > Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/> > Community. > > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > > -- Kári Gunnarsson markþjálfi kari.gunnars...@simnet.is https://www.facebook.com/heimsmynd (+354) 864 5189
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org