Hi Richard,

Thank you. Inspiring. Questions about your project:

1. In the slides you write "Avoid: Skimp on detail - Free-form session grid 
with no obvious day/time/space boxes". Does this mean you tried a free-form 
grid? If yes, what happened?

2. How did you (or someone) get management to say yes to a 6-week open space?

Best regards,
Thomas 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 9 jan 2015, at 15:57, Richard Kasperowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Thomas! I think OS is perfect for this! 8 people, 2-3 days, desire to 
> explore: perfect!
> 
> When I worked with Nokia, we did an OS for 6 weeks straight. We were 
> transferring responsibility for a large software product from a legacy team 
> to a new team. We could have spent a lot of time designing a curriculum, 
> training trainers, running classes, etc.--and probably getting it wrong. 
> Instead, we used OS and let things emerge. The right people did the right 
> things with the right groups at the right times, and, without knowing how it 
> would happen ahead of time, we got it done. I shared some of the story here 
> http://kasperowski.com/2012/10/radical-innovation-six-week-open-space.html .
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> --
> Richard Kasperowski
> http://kasperowski.com/
> 
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Perret via OSList 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi friends,
>> 
>> I would like some help.
>> 
>> I have been approached by a company who wants to find innovations within a 
>> certain technology. They are looking to have a team of 8-10 working for 2 or 
>> 3 days, and they have invited me to give them a suggestion for how to go 
>> about it.
>> 
>> My questions:
>> 
>> 1. Do you think OS is the best approach with only 8 people and this kind of 
>> mission? If not, how would you go about it? If yes, how have you had it work?
>> 2. There are over 100 people in the company - how could one utilise this 
>> potential for the purpose without having to release everybody from client 
>> work for 2-3 days?
>> 3. They would really want to explore new innovations more broadly, but are 
>> looking, for now, to look within a certain technology because they fear 
>> being more general will give less results. Thoughts on this?
>> 
>> Gratefully,
>> Thomas
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> 
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to