Hi Brigitt,What if you could collect stories of what happens after the OST
meetings? Both from participants and non-participants in the System, and how
they experience a possible relation to the meetings? Might bring interesting
insights. I would love to hear your stories.Good luck with your research,
Tonnie van der ZouwenProfessor Sustainable Working and Organising Avans
University of Applied Sciences.
Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung-apparaat
-------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------
Van: Harrison Owen via OSList <[email protected]>
Datum: 26-02-17 20:03 (GMT+01:00)
Aan: 'Birgitt Williams' <[email protected]>, 'World wide Open
Space Technology email list' <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: [OSList] Research OST
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.gmailmsg
{mso-style-name:gmail_msg;}
span.m9190644156065346224gmailmsg
{mso-style-name:m_9190644156065346224gmailmsg;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->Brigitt – I think you are doing quite well. Keep going! Possible hypotheses
to be tested: Learning as a self organizing phenomenon: Do Kids do better in
Open Space?Project design – A self organizing reality? -- Will you do better,
faster in Open Space?Organizational Planning: When the Whole System is in the
room and self organizing – Do we Fly? ???????.....Just for a beginning. ho
Winter Address7808 River Falls Dr.Potomac, MD 20854301-365-2093 Summer
Address189 Beaucauire AveCamden, ME 04843207 763-3261
Websiteswww.openspaceworld.comwww.ho-image.com From: OSList
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Birgitt Williams
via OSList
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:52 AM
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] Research OST thank you Harrison for simplifying what is
and is not OST for researchers. I would be pleased if you (and others of
course) would be willing to add more of a picture for what researchers could be
looking for/measuring. It has always been a puzzle to me as to how we could do
a good job of the research. Those of us who work with/experience OST know
that-it works every time-outcomes beyond what is expected occur including an
experience of self leadership, shared vision, exceptional communications, self
management including efficient use of personal
energy/wisdom/learning/contributing-quantity of discussions that take place is
much greater than people think can be possible-quality of discussions is much
greater How do we put this into a research design so that we can capture the
narrative from a research perspective? And not to miss out on the other
important aspects of 'does it make a difference that matters?' in the long run
I realize that some will feel there is no point to doing this research. Maybe
there is not. And yet I so love OST as a meeting method, I know it has made so
much difference in the world, and I believe that there is an important step
that will be valuable which is to capture the research about OST before the
variations on it cloud the picture more than is already happening. This may not
be possible. Research is not my strong point ....I am a story teller at heart
and understand the importance of story as evidence....and yet I know that story
is still considered soft science, or at art, outside of the realm of hard
science.Peaceful Sunday to all,Birgitt On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM
Harrison Owen <[email protected]> wrote:Sorry. Misunderstood. My point for the
researchers is simple – a) Insure that the essential experimental conditions
are present. (real issue, voluntary attendance, massive complexity, similar
diversity, decision time of yesterday) b) Follow procedure (Circle Bulletin
board, market place, go to work) – Then open your eyes, take out pencils
cameras, recorders and have at it. Useful topics will overwhelm. --- Efficiency
effectiveness compared to “standard procedures, resolution of conflict,
personal growth and development, learning potential and on and on. Have fun! ho
Winter Address7808 River Falls Dr.Potomac, MD 20854301-365-2093 Summer
Address189 Beaucauire AveCamden, ME 04843207 763-3261
Websiteswww.openspaceworld.comwww.ho-image.com From: OSList
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Birgitt Williams
via OSList
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:30 PM
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] Research OST Harrison---the point I was making is about
research. If the research is based on going down the path of proving self
organization, it is not as valuable to making the case for OST as OST works! It
simply works, is useful, creates results. BirgittOn Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:16
PM Harrison Owen <[email protected]> wrote:Birgitt – I guess we differ.
Proving that self organization works is about as useful as proving that oxygen
works for breathing. Seems to. And are there other things going on in Open
Space apart from self organization? Absolutely. Or perhaps not at all. Just
life. ho Winter Address7808 River Falls Dr.Potomac, MD 20854301-365-2093 Summer
Address189 Beaucauire AveCamden, ME 04843207 763-3261
Websiteswww.openspaceworld.comwww.ho-image.com From: OSList
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Birgitt Williams
via OSList
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 3:28 PM
To: World wide Open Space Technology email listSubject: Re: [OSList] Research
OST Great summary Harrison of what is OST and what is not OST. it is a
significant challenge to find what is actually an OST meeting. One of the
reasons I created our workshop Working With OST is to make that distinction
very clear to all who participate with us. OST facilitated well requires
understanding the essence of what is created...and never as the facilitator
violating that essence. People have referred to me as a 'purist' and that is
fine by me. I believe in OST just as you created it. I do not believe in the
variations having the same outcomes. When something is added before OST or
after OST, they are not OST...and helping a group of people be absolutely clear
when the actual OST begins and when it ends is part of what we are very careful
about. We have developed a complimentary method, Whole Person Process
Facilitation, to use when OST is not the right method...and yet is based on as
little intervention as possible, and creating 'maximum choice, maximum freedom'
to the degree possible. Unfortunately, after the meetings, people will say 'we
want another one of those open space meetings. They feel that the space is open
and like to refer to it that way. I cannot do anything about this conclusion
that people make, and it is not OST. I also think that a disservice was done
when OST was being looked at from the lens of 'self organizing', one lens that
applies certainly, and not the only one...and in my perspective a rather
limited one. The reason I say this is a disservice is that too much effort was
spent proving that self organizing works, instead of proving through research
and other means, that OST works. Having a clean hypothesis about OST as a
useful, productive method that achieves incredible results is more valuable
that proving it works for some particular reason. My two cents on the
subject,Birgitt On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:05 PM Harrison Owen via OSList
<[email protected]> wrote:One of the questions I find myself
asking of various "researchers," -- What,
exactly, are you looking at?
Open Space has wandered and permutated globally, and taken 30+ years doing
that. So lots of times the "Open Space" people say they are looking at
(researching) has nothing to do with anything that I might call OST.
Needless to say I don't own, but I did coin the phrase -- and arguably, I've
spent more time fussing with OST than anybody else. Alternatives,
Variations, Permutations are not wrong, bad, or immoral -- but are not OST.
And in research "facts" do matter. Despite our current (US) administration.
So for me, if you a going to do research on Open Space Technology (OST) --
it really needs to be done "by the book." The Book being, "Open Space
Technology: A User's Guide 3rd Edition (Berrett- Koehler, 2008)" I might
consider that the "Lab Book."
The experimental procedure is clearly laid out.
The "event" will be convened around an issue people seriously care about
(Real issue - not pretend, made up, chosen at random).
All participants will come in response to a Real Invitation. One they can
refuse. No coercion. All are present because they choose to be there.
Once present, participants will be invited to sit in a circle, create a
bulletin board of the issues they care about, and the open a market place to
make/confirm the times and places of meeting.
The Facilitator will be present only at the beginning (1st 15 min.) and
appear again only at the end (of the day or program). In other words, The
facilitator will NEVER intervene. NEVER. Picking up coffee cups is
appropriate. Otherwise, being "present and invisible" -- is the rule.
Anything else... "Variants, Twists, Tweaks -- whatever ... is not OST. Could
be great. May be fantastic. But it ain't OST.
And when it comes to "results" the "researcher" might check "Wave Rider:
Leadership for High Performance in a Self Organizing World." That would be
my best effort at a Final Report for the 30 year experiment. Which doesn't
make it perfect, right or anything special. But it might be a place to
start.
Harrison
Winter Address
7808 River Falls Dr.
Potomac, MD 20854
301-365-2093
Summer Address
189 Beaucauire Ave
Camden, ME 04843
207 763-3261
Websites
www.openspaceworld.com
www.ho-image.com
-----Original Message-----
From: OSList [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Hege Steinsland via OSList
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:54 AM
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: [OSList] Research OST
Hello.
I`m working on an article about the experience with OST in Norwegian work-
places, in particular municipalities.
I wonder if there are som kind of overview of earlier research on the field,
published and unpublished
Would be great :-)
All the best
Hege Steinsland
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an
email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to _______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
