I did an issue for the Appreciative Inquiry Practitioner newsletter in 2004 (!!) on the relationship between Appreciative Inquiry and Open Space.
Here’s the table of contents: http://peggyholman.com/papers/articles/appreciative-inquiry-and-open-space/ <http://peggyholman.com/papers/articles/appreciative-inquiry-and-open-space/> The opening essays <http://peggyholman.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/aip0411-0.Opening.Essays.pdf> include one by me called Emerging in Appreciative Space, one by Harrison called Open Space as Appreciative and one by Diana Whitney called An Open Invitation to the Appreciative. Peggy ________________________________ Peggy Holman Co-founder Journalism That Matters 15347 SE 49th Place Bellevue, WA 98006 206-948-0432 www.journalismthatmatters.org www.peggyholman.com Twitter: @peggyholman JTM Twitter: @JTMStream Enjoy the award winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity <http://www.engagingemergence.com/> > On Jun 24, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Bhavesh Patel via OSList > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I see AI more like a framework within which you could use OST at the Dream > stage or at other stages. > > AI definitely increases the constraints within which self-organisation > happens, and also has a set of assumptions behind it's approach. > > The question for me is what does your context need? Rather than whether any > approach is better or worse? Most things could be useful when used in the > right context! > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 15:13, Jake Yeager via OSList > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > Hey everyone, > > First, thank you all for entertaining my questions! I really appreciate your > responses: they help me learn a great deal and to recognize the--often > erroneous!--assumptions I am making. > > That said, I have another question! :) What do you find to be the > relationship between Appreciative Inquiry (AI) and OST? > > I am studying AI as part of my OD training at work, and it doesn't sit 100% > with me like Open Space does. I think it's because I feel it is manipulative, > that is, it uses generative questions to guide participants' trajectory as > opposed to letting the participants themselves choose their trajectory. > However, AI appears to be very effective, so I wonder if my resistance is due > to some unconscious bias I have. > > Would love to hear your thoughts. > > Thanks! > > Much love, > Jake > ________________ > > When the mind is quiet, the sun of your heart will shine once again, and you > will be free of problems. > - Robert Adams > <http://www.robert-adams.info/>_______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > <http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org> > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>_______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
