I cannot say much more. AFAIK it is rather experimental profile and it's setting is simple, probably what is a water object is routeable. Finer details are not addressed.
You can analyze the profile content and aventually improve it by additional logic based on water related osm tagging. 31. srpna 2016 12:36:01 CEST, 'P Wat' via Osmand <[email protected]> napsal: >Thank you Poutnik for your input. >After some false starts then trial and error, "River" mode now >functioning >OK, but .... >Some of the routes presented by Brouter-River-mode/Osmand are >un-navigable. > >For example, checking stretches of the River Thames known to me:- >(Pic1) This route is shown going over the weir rather than through the >lock. 51.559888, -0.873266. >(Pic2) Shows a navigable route via a lock, not over the weir. >51.567255, >-0.76882. >(Pic3) This absurd route is via minor streams and ditches. Should go >south >from 51.432725, -0.515320, not north. >(Pic4) = Road map of Pic3. >Several similar instances already found elsewhere. > >These anomalies would make route-planning in "foreign" waters, >seriously >flawed! >Is this caused by the "River" algorithm? >Regards >Paul W > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups "Osmand" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >an email to [email protected]. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Sent from my phone via Android email client K-9. Please, forgive my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
