----------
Dne 28. listopadu 2018 20:47:04 Stefan Monnier <[email protected]>
napsal:
Would it make sense to adjust this coefficient based on distance, then?
I.e. when the "straight line to destination" is hundreds of km, use
a value around 1.4/1.5, but only use 1.2/1.3 or so when the distance is
down to a handful of kilometers?
Theoretically yes, but practically is it a double trouble with switching
routing.xml files and their updates at OSMAnd updates.
IMHO is better some universal value
I guess on long distance routes, it would tend to make the initial part
of the route worse, tho (the part where you're trying to get out of the
city as quickly as possible and where the optimal route often involves
going temporarily further from the destination in order to escape the
denser traffic).
It would tend to take the router that are better at the start, but it
depends on coefficient value and the rating profile of routes.
E.g high coefficients will tend to prefer fast ways at the start to the
ones at the end, when deciding about comparable routes..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
