Thanks for making the case, Majka. I do think that this retooling of the Directions menu is dramatic enough to require some explanation. The navigation section on the website <https://osmand.net/features/navigation> hasn't been updated, and I don't think the utility of the graphs is obvious to newcomers, let alone many other users. Your description might help here.
Meanwhile, no comment yet from the developers on the disappearance of the "Analyze on map" function, either here or on GitHub. I'm hoping it was done in error. On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 12:59:17 AM UTC-8, Majka wrote: > > On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 6:58:43 AM UTC-8, Bart Eisenberg wrote: >>>> >>>> On the 3.3.2 directions menu, I'm not seeing the useful "Analyze on >>>> map" function that correlates the elevation profile with the route on the >>>> map. Allowing, for example, you to see with a swipe the location of the >>>> highest point on the route. >>>> >>>> And I don't understand the purpose of the detailed analysis of Road >>>> types, Surface, Steepness, and Smoothness--with Step-by-step directions, >>>> presumably the most useful for navigation, relegated to the bottom. >>>> >>> > It depends on your use case - for bike navigation, surface, steepness and > smoothness are sometimes much more important then the total route length. > This is something I want to see when I analyse the route, not the > step-by-step directions. I want to see how "cyclable" the suggested / > planned route is more than how long. It goes in both directions - somebody > can be looking for the "trail" experience, somebody else for more or less > smooth ride. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
