>From the perspective of a fan of Dutch cycle infrastructure, I'll be keen to see this operational. Sorry I dont have the skills to contribute. Good luck. Paul W
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 9:03:09 AM UTC+1, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > > > Op wo 11 sep. 2019 om 07:22 schreef Peer <v7p...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: > >> In the screenshot you see two cycle nodes (fietsknooppunten) : 56 and 57. >> Location: Dalfsen, Netherlands >> >> nr 56: 52.51646N, 6.230626E >> nr 57: 52.52559N, 6.24799E >> >> > Thank you. These nodes are also displayed on my phone. > I checked the nodes with other nodes and can't find a difference with the > others. All of them are part of (cycle) routes. Most are part of relations. > Some have the old rwn_ref and the new rcn_ref. > It is really strange. > > Anyway. The bug is being worked on. Probably something in the code with > priorities of what is displayed versus the priority in the > default_render.xml. > > Harry > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/e36099b7-6457-4900-b182-bf098aa35389%40googlegroups.com.
