That could be. I'm thinking about doing a video tutorial on the new profiles and didn't want to overlook anything.
On Friday, February 28, 2020 at 5:41:01 PM UTC-8, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Bart Eisenberg <[email protected] <javascript:>> writes: > > > The Walking profile or one of the other activity-based profiles work for > me > > when I'm just browsing. But if your point is that the "Browse map" > profile > > presents an uncluttered view when navigation isn't a goal, that answers > my > > question. Thanks. > > Yes, that is indeed my point. I find that Browse map is different in > not having extra things only needed when navigating (but I couldn't tell > you what they are) and also in that it doesn't invoke night mode at > night. > > It does seem that e.g. the car profile suppresses trails compared to > browse, and that browse is thereofre intended as more of a neutral view > like mapnik standard. > > But I also see your point that using an activity profile to browse is > pretty sensible, too, especially if one's browsing is goal-directed > towards later doing that activity. > > I suspect in the end this issue doesn't matter much. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/f0b25606-52fd-4eb2-a1df-360c0566aed8%40googlegroups.com.
