Harry: Thanks!
Akanna: The way you're using the tools, not navigating with a GPX, no, I
don't think the route points make any difference.
*With* GPX navigation, there is an option "Calculate route between points";
it uses the routing points to create a route. I've had some success with
that, but, so far, not perfection.
On Sunday, March 15, 2020 at 10:22:12 AM UTC-7, Bart Eisenberg wrote:
>
> Per @Harry van der Wolf, I've been experimenting with the Measure distance
> feature, and I agree, it's a fast, flexible way to create GPXs.
>
> The function has two ways to create a GPX, which begs a question: why
> would you save a route as "a line" rather than as "route points"? Looking
> at the resulting GPXs, it appears that both use trkpt coordinates. In
> addition, saving as "route points" also include rtept coordinates ("turn
> points" in the GPX schema), which are the places you have marked out with
> the Measure tool.
>
> Route points have some advantages. Is there any reason not to have them?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/a9ec9e8b-7145-443f-975d-df0760bcd209%40googlegroups.com.
