Hello, I was just thinking about doing this myself because none of the 
rendering options currently available are suitable for walking in many 
parts of the UK where there is a dense network of various designated and 
other paths and features. It would be so good to have clearly highlighted 
public rights of way. Did you put in a request to include the designation 
tag? I don't think designated would be sufficient from what I have seen of 
the underlying trail tagging. I will resort to building my own obf if 
necessary. Is it just a question of adding entries such as this?
<type tag="designation" value="public_footpath" ...



On Saturday, 16 March 2019 21:22:15 UTC, Jonathan Stuart wrote:
>
> Thanks. I got my renderer working to show rights of way in different 
> colours depending on what they are (footpath, bridleway, byway, etc) and on 
> whether they're a public RoW or permissive, etc. Unfortunately, this 
> requires me to generate my own obf files with a custom rendering_types.xml 
> that includes "designated" values and the "designation" tag. It would be 
> great if this data could be included in the standard obf files.
>
> On Sunday, 10 March 2019 02:48:23 UTC, A Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, everyone. I was just trying to do the same thing, got bored when 
>> it didn't work, and instead decided to go browse this group's archive for 
>> the first time in a while!
>>
>> I agree with your motivation, Jonathan: in the UK people are starting to 
>> mark legally designated footpaths with designation= and if a route looks 
>> questionable but someone had taken the trouble to tag it as official, it 
>> would be nice to be able to check that. I was thinking of adding some sort 
>> of show/hide option to the renderer I use for walking (here 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/osmand/WyGJS0Dekrk/MjLn_ALTBQAJ>).
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/01358bf2-35be-44cf-bdbe-fe581a9928cbo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to