"'Xavier' via OsmAnd" <[email protected]> writes: > So this tagging would say that the "highway=residential" tag was > removed, not that the way itself was removed. > > So this implies that OsmAnd's processor of OSM data is likely not > programmed to recognize the removed: namespace for indicating that a > road no longer exists.
I think it's a bigger problem. If in the new data, there isn't a way with highway=something, then in the live-updated db on one's phone, there shouldn't be a way with highway=something. It's not crazy to retag a way to something else, and if it turns into something that shouldn't be rendered or routed, it shouldn't be rendered or routed in OsmAnd. THe kind of sync that Live is doing is very difficult, so bugs would not surprise me. I find that it works remarkably well, although new things are far more common than removals. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/rmi5z8v11kj.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
