I was browsing the pedestrian section of routing.xml online here <https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/routing/routing.xml>. This part caught my attention:
<point attribute="obstacle_time"> <select value="5" t="highway" v="traffic_signals"/> <select value="10" t="crossing" v="unmarked"/> <select value="5" t="crossing" v="uncontrolled"/> <select value="30" t="crossing" v="traffic_signals"/> <select value="5" t="highway" v="crossing"/> ... </point> According to the OSM wiki here <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians> and here <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dtraffic_signals> and the usage near me, highway <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> =crossing <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing> + crossing <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing>=traffic_signals can be placed at a pedestrian crossing on a road even when no intersecting pedestrian way is mapped. E.g. there is a crossing, and pedestrians are probably on sidewalks but they aren't mapped as separate ways. Would the XML above penalise a walking route along a road passing such crossings, even though they probably wouldn't need to be taken? I'm just naive and curious, so please don't reply if you have anything better to do :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/fda4a992-1cfa-49e8-a0ec-9359bb8c9218n%40googlegroups.com.
