Sorry the tag is route_bicycle, not bicycle_route Op vrijdag 18 december 2020 om 14:20:43 UTC+1 schreef Peter Elderson:
> Hi there! > I am trying to get OsmAnd routing to prefer mapped routes, i.e. member > ways of a recreational route relation, especially hiking/foot routes. I am > told this works for bicycle routes, but > a. I can't figure out how this works, > b. I can't use the same mechanism for walking routes > > I am looking at tweaking router.xml. It uses a key-only tag bicycle_route. > This indicates that the candidate way is a member of a bicycle route > relation. I would like to understand how this key/tag gets set. Anyone > familiar with that (...everyone nods...)? > > A friend tells me "I suppose it happens during the conversion of the osm > data to the osmand model". Converting membership of a relation into an > attribute of the way which would make it available for the routing engine. > > Anyone familiar with this? If it's a hardcoded thing I want to make an > issue in github, if it's configurable I would like some pointers how to do > that. > > Thnx! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/08681d5d-ef21-452d-98b5-650799fa45f7n%40googlegroups.com.
