Dmytro Prodchenko <[email protected]> writes: > Hi! Thank you for the feedback. We are working on improving search results > as part of adding addresses to the results. However, as you pointed out > that there is something wrong with the address, I have created an issue for > our team: > [https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-Issues/issues/3135](https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-Issues/issues/3135)
Perhaps related: When I search for an address in the US, and do "find city", I am given a list of city/towns. In my area, that really should mean admin level 8 entities, and the list seems reasonable. When I am presented with the list, it is not annotated with the admin level 2 (state) name. This is a problem because here in New England town names are very often taken from England, so that e.g. both Massachusetts and New Hampshire have a Concord, and most such town names are used in more than one state. So this is sort of a bug/feature request to show admin level 2 for identification when displaying city/town in address search. Perhaps more generally, for all admin levels < 8, if the admin level of the searched entity is different from the admin level of the search start point, display it. I'd certainly want to know if a town is in Canada vs US/Vermont, were I close enough for those hits to appear. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/rmipl92wbep.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.
