what „sonora“ describes and thinks about this important topic is exactly my viewpoint and experience. never forget the user in the field who cannot just download some hundreds of MB. good you are working on it and improving, thank you!
[email protected] schrieb am Mittwoch, 11. März 2026 um 10:14:35 UTC+1: > Currently, OsmAnd can switch from Fast to Slow routing for four or five > different reasons, which are often unclear to users (see discussion: > https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/22987). To address this, we > are working on providing clear status messages that explain what is > happening, the type of routing algorithm being used, and why the app > switched to a slower route. Additionally, we are introducing more > user-friendly settings that allow users to choose between Auto, Fast, and > Standard routing. > On Friday, 6 March 2026 at 18:08:22 UTC+2 ralph lumen wrote: > >> your first link every usmand-user should read! great! sorry I didn't hear >> of that before. do I get it right, that IF i set up profiles different then >> high-speed I do not have to switch manually to vintage routing? or would it >> be better for them to work as quick as possible to be set manually? I >> already had realized that only high-speed routes/profiles deliver that >> incredibly better performance ... > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/b16dfb9c-0d81-4d4d-8949-66fce7a999a9n%40googlegroups.com.
