On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:46:17 +0200 Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/08/2019 19:15, Alexander Couzens wrote: > > > > > > 1800 MHz (max. 0,2 W) > > 680 (1838,8/1743,8 MHz) > > 683 (1839,4/1744,4 MHz) > > 686 (1840,0/1745,0 MHz) > > 689 (1840,6/1745,6 MHz) > > 692 (1841,2/1746,2 MHz) > > 695 (1841,8/1746,8 MHz) > > Great! weird though, how it is laid out like that. > > Given unusable adjacent ARFCNs, They are essentially giving us 1838.7 > to 1841.9 (DL), so there are 8 usable AFRCNs in there. I would guess, they're using the ARFCN in between themselfs. > > Anyway, I guess this means we can deploy plenty of BTS. Do we have any > interest in the 1800Mhz sysmoBTS 2050? (with power output reduced way > way down, of course!) or should I just leave that heavy monster at > home? Not sure about it. It's quite heavy. I also don't know what kind of power consumption it needs. But we'll need a lot BTSen :). -- Alexander Couzens mail: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] gpg: 390D CF78 8BF9 AA50 4F8F F1E2 C29E 9DA6 A0DF 8604
pgpmAHa7mHZUc.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
