> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Welte <[email protected]>
> Sent: piątek, 11 lutego 2022 10:12
> To: Marcin Szycik <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Drewek,
> Wojciech <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/5] gtp: Allow to create GTP device
> without FDs
>
Hi Harald,
Thanks for triggering CI.
Do I see correctly that results for our changes are the same as for master?
Regards,
Wojtek
> Hi Marcin,
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:04:01PM +0100, Marcin Szycik wrote:
> > On 05-Feb-22 17:34, Harald Welte wrote:
> > > Hi Marcin, Wojciech,
> > >
> > > thanks for the revised patch. In general it looks fine to me.
> > >
> > > Do you have a public git tree with your patchset applied? I'm asking as
> > > we do have automatic testing in place at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/
> > > where I
> > > just need to specify a remote git repo andit will build this kernel and
> > > run the test suite.
> >
> > I've created a public fork with our patchset applied, please see [1].
>
> Thanks, I've triggered a build, let's hope it works out. Results should
> be at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/
> and detailed logs at
> https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/console
>
> The same testsuite executed against master can be seen at
> https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-latest-torvalds/
> [the high amount of test cases failing is due to the lack of IPv6 support in
> the kernel GTP].
>
> Let's hope your forked repo renders identical test results to upstream!
>
> Regards,
> Harald
> --
> - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
> (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
