One could probably write a program that can tune to a known signal and then test through a range of sample rates to determine which ones generate a data stream that when treated at the expected sample rate gives the expected signal
.... a project for another day. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Sylvain Munaut <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Sylvain. That makes sense. I probably wouldn't have spent so much > > time on it if the lib gave some indication that it wasn't setting those > > rates. > > Well, we don't really know exactly what rates are supported by the > hardware or not since there isn't exactly good documentation on it ... > and the lib will just pass that to the hardware as long as the range > fits into the "registers". This way users can experiment ... > > But if you want reliable operation you should stick to "known" working > samples rates like 250k 1M 1.024M 2M 2.048M 2.4M > > Cheers > > Sylvain >
