On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 20:29 +0200, Steve Markgraf wrote: > Hi David, > > On 28.06.2018 17:43, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > With just 'inline', if the compiler decides not to inline them, it isn't > > required to emit them at all. For some targets with -Os that is causing > > build failures. > > "It isn't required to emit them at all" - What the heck, which compiler > on earth does such horrible things? > > I've taken at look at the C99 standard for the function specifier > 'inline' and there is nothing that would justify such behaviour. > > Of course, if that's a bug with a specific compiler version we can merge > that, but the explanation in the commit doesn't make any sense to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86360
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
