Hi Christian, On 15 September 2012 04:06, Christian H. Bruhn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi! > > It would be usefull, if you could have a prefix for all > database-tables. So you could store original OSM-data in one set of > tables and own data in another set of tables. So there will be e.g. > one table osm_nodes and one own_data_nodes. > > The database-tasks must be modified and also the SQL-scripts must have > a value where you can add the prefix. > This hasn't come up very often. It's not a bad idea, but it's a bit of work to implement. The hardest part is propagating the prefix throughout the codebase so that it can be incorporated in the dynamically generated queries. As always, I'm more than happy to accept a patch if it can be done in a relatively clean way. Brett
_______________________________________________ osmosis-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmosis-dev
