Sujay,
 
OSPF can make use of various cryptographic algorithms in order to authenticate 
its packets. Your concern is wrt interoperability between disparate 
implementations where a particular implementation may not implement some 
certain mandatory-to-implement algorithms. To ensure this doesn’t happen, it is 
necessary to specify a set of mandatory-to-implement algorithms so that there 
is at least one algorithm that all implementations will have available. 
 
We cannot assume this mandatory-to-implement algorithm to be MD5, as this has 
been broken. MD5CRK, was a distributed computing project to break the MD5 hash 
algorithm in a short period of time. The project closed down with the 
publication of their paper by Wang, X. et al., "Collisions for Hash Functions 
MD4, MD5, HAVAL-128 and RIPEMD", August 2004, http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/199  

draft-bhatia-manral-crypto-req-ospf-00.txt defines the current set of 
mandatory-to-implement algorithms that can be used for the cryptographic 
authentication for OSPF as well as specifies the algorithms that should/must be 
implemented because they may get promoted to mandatory at some future time. 
 
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ospf/draft-bhatia-manral-crypto-req-ospf-00.txt
 
Cheers,
Manav 
________________________________
 From: sujay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:36 PM
 To: 'Manav Bhatia'
 Cc: 'Mailing List'; [email protected]
 Subject: RE: [OSPF] Revised OSPF HMAC SHA Authentication Draft
 
 
 Yes,
 If an authentication fails it could mean the algo's used are different.
 And if one implementation supports MD5 alone( "which I believe is commonly 
used !" ), the others
 support otherwise, It could be a problem, there is no explicit way we are 
converying which algo is being used.
 The Au Type = 2 is overloaded.
 Now a "MUST" clause is for the WG to decide.
 Regds,
 Sujay G
 My Location;
 
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=14.626109,76.959229&spn=4.724852,7.525085&t=h&hl=en
 
--
Lucent Technologies
 
 


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to