Hi Acee, On April 07, 2007 4:08 AM, Acee Lindem wrote: > Hi Liu, > > On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Liu Ya wrote: > > > Hi Acee, > > > > At IETF 68th meeting you raised a question that 'chickens and eggs' > > issue is hard to solve. Thank you for your question. In fact, 7 reqs > > are concluded in the -00 version doc. REQ-1 ~ REQ-4 are > concerned with > > that issue. In my opinion, they can all be resolved by MSEC > > techniques. Maybe the comparison of 'c&e' is used > improperly a bit in > > the slide. > > Ok - us OSPF guys don't like to think anyone can route more than one
> hop without them. > By setting up a key server, or a subordinate key server, per OSPFv3 multicast network, existing MSEC techniques can solve that problem in one hop. However, that solution sounds cost expensive a bit. Commets from MSEC folks are welcome, and would be helpful to this topic. I've CCed MSEC list. regards, Liu Ya > Thanks, > Acee > > > > > Any other questions and comments are welcome. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Liu Ya > > > > Following contents are taken from OSPF WG minutes. > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> OSPF v3 automated group keying Requirements for MSEC - Michael > > Barnes > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> Acee > >> - Looks like requirements hard to satify - chicken and egg problem > >> Michael > >> - Not an easy problem to solve > >> - Not ready to jump right into solutions, hence this document > > > > > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
