Hi Anton, Jin,
I guess I don't really understand the point of controversy here. I
agree with Anton. Note that if there is not an active virtual link
then the non-backbone area is not a transit area.
Thanks,
Acee
On Apr 29, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Anton Smirnov wrote:
Jin,
right. In network design where such scenario is possible you always
can create VL between this ABR and ABR providing best path via transit
area. This will make the best path 'visible' to other routers in
backbone.
Anton
Jin Wang wrote:
Thanks for anton's response.
But if so,only the traffic going through this ABR(determined
before 16.3
calculating result) is forwarded by the new optimal path.For those
other
traffic not forwarded via this ABR(determined by 16.1 & 16.2) in the
backbone will not consider the new path(via ABR) even path is
shorter.right?
Best regards,
Wangjin
Accton Technology China Company Ltd.
Shanghai R&D Center
TEL:+86-021-64859922*6227
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site:www.accton.com.cn
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
