I believe so Ajay.
 
Matthew R Thomas
07940 585456

________________________________

From: ajay thakur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 04/09/2007 17:30
To: Matthew Thomas
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSPF] duplcate entries in retransmission list ?


You mean to say whenever we add LSA in retransmission list we should 
remove old LSA & add new LSA in the list. ?



Thanks
Ajay


Matthew Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        
        Hi Ajay,
         
        I believe these conditions have been selected to make sure this doesnt 
happen:
         
        (excerpt from 2328)
        
            13.1.  Determining which LSA is newer
         
                When a router encounters two instances of an LSA, it must
                determine which is more recent.  This occurred above when
                comparing a received LSA to its database copy.  This comparison
                must also be done during the Database Exchange procedure which
                occurs during adjacency bring-up.
         
                An LSA is identified by its LS type, Link State ID and
                Advertising Router.  For two instances of the same LSA, the LS
                sequence number, LS age, and LS checksum fields are used to
                determine which instance is more recent:
         
        
                o   The LSA having the newer LS sequence number is more recent.
                    See Section 12.1.6 for an explanation of the LS sequence
                    number space.  If both instances have the same LS sequence
                    number, then:
         
                o   If the two instances have different LS checksums, then the
                    instance having the larger LS checksum (when considered as a
                    16-bit unsigned integer) is considered more recent.
         
                o   Else, if only one of the instances has its LS age field set
                    to MaxAge, the instance of age MaxAge is considered to be
                    more recent.
         
                o   Else, if the LS age fields of the two instances differ by
                    more than MaxAgeDiff, the instance having the smaller
                    (younger) LS age is considered to be more recent.
         
                o   Else, the two instances are considered to be identical.
         
        Matthew R Thomas
        07940 585456

                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: ajay thakur <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
                To: [email protected] 
                Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 3:35 PM
                Subject: [OSPF] duplcate entries in retransmission list ?

                HI all, 
                Is it possible that router tries to add same LSA entry in the 
neighbor retransmission list multiple times? 
                
                 Given the fact that only {adv-rtr, LS-Id, lsa-type} are used 
to identify LSA. 
                
                What is {adv-rtr,ls-id,lsa-type} is same for both the routers 
but ls-seq, age, checksum different for both the lsa?
                
                
                Can somebody clear my doubt.
                
                Thanks
                Ajay
                
________________________________

                Once upon a time there was 1 GB storage in your inbox. Click 
here for happy ending. 
<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_3/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/>
  
________________________________

                _______________________________________________
                OSPF mailing list
                [email protected]
                https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
                


________________________________

5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox. Click here. 
<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_4/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/>
 

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to