On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > Historically, the draft/RFC is titled router capabilities but you'll > note that the actual name of the LSA is the RI (Router Information > LSA). I do believe that the system name fits in the category of > information and it WILL be used in OSPF for routing - not directly > for calculating OSPF routes but for debugging networks when routing > doesn't work. Hence, IMHO, it satisfies both the criteria for > inclusion in the default instance and the criteria for inclusion in > the OSPF RI LSA. Like most of the other information in the RI LSA, > I'd expect it be fairly static.
And this is indeed why it's been defined as such. -danny _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
