On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:35 PM, PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri wrote: > acee, > >> Question regarding PW3 document (Andrew's draft) >> Acee - not a big fan >> Dave Ward - have the authors give another presentation >> Dimitri Papadimitriou - What is holdup? > > add: comments raised were addressed (e.g. possibility to segment > between > instances when solution will be made available by OSPF WG see Section > 5.3).
Added. > >> Acee - Number of people didn't like it, but we are deferring to >> PW3 group. Now it seems that PW3 is supporting it so can bring >> it back to OSPF WG for consideration. > > side note: i would like to keep the discussion at the technical > level if > any remaining - ping-pong between working groups do not help solving > them. Added. > >> Multi-instance / Transport Instance Draft - Acee (See Slides) >> >> Will be pushing harder for this, discuss on list > > add (if my record is correct, you stated also that): the working group > will open the floor for alternative solutions once the problem > statement > will be refined further than a brief overview introduction (as it > is the > case in this v00 of the document). We won't stop anything from being proposed. Didn't I ask the that technical discussions be addressed in separate mail threads? Thanks, Acee > > thanks, > -d. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Acee Lindem >> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 5:23 PM >> To: OSPF List >> Subject: [OSPF] IETF 71 OSPF WG Minutes >> >> Please unicast corrections to me. If you want to discuss a >> specific topic, please start a thread on this list with the >> specific topic as the subject (this will make searching the >> archives easier). >> >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08mar/minutes/ospf.txt >> >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
