Hi Acee, Thanks for your review and comments!
Since there are no technical issues, I will update the I-D until the end of the WG last call. On 2008-04-04, at 22:49:13 Acee Lindem wrote: >I can't speak for the OSPF WG as a whole, but I have reviewed the >subject document and am very happy to see that the suggestion to use >separate inter-AS LSA types has been incorporated. I have no further >technical comments on the document and trust that the ccamp WG has >verified that this information encoding meets the TE requirements. >The usage described in sections 2.2 and 2.3 seem reasonable to me. > >I have the following editorial comments: > > 1. Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.2 - Both of these say "Use of the TE >Router ID is RECOMMENDED." I believe these should be respectively >replaced by "Use of the TE Router Address as specified in the Router >Address TLV [OSPF-TE] is RECOMMENDED." and "Use of the TE Router IPv6 >Address as specified in the IPv6 Router Address as specified in the >IPv6 Router Address TLV [OSPF-V3-TE] is RECOMMENDED." > 2. Section 3.2.1 states "This is because... that may operate in a >different address space;". If they are using a different address >space on the link between the ASes, then I'd expect there to be >problems with BGP as well :^) I'd suggest: > "Given that OSPF is an IGP and should only be utilized between >routers in the same routing domain, the OSPF specific Link ID and >Neighbor ID sub-TLVs are not applicable to inter-AS links.". > 3. You may want to expand some acronyms on their first use. For >example, "AS Boundary Router (ASBR)", "Link State Advertisement >(LSA)" and > "Path Computation Element (PCE)". > 4. [OSPFV3] is listed to as both a Normative and Informative >reference. > >Thanks, >Acee > >On Mar 19, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> You may recall providing useful review and feedback on >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas- >> te-extension-02.txt >> >> The authors believe that they have taken on board all the comments >> received >> from the OSPF working group and have updated the draft accordingly. >> >> >> CCAMP is holding a three week working group last call on this I-D >> along with >> its IS-IS partner document: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-isis-interas- >> te-extension-00.txt >> >> These documents describe how to advertise the TE links that connect >> an AS to >> the outside world within the AS's IGP. As the drafts are at pains >> to point >> out, there is no proposal to advertise the TE information more >> widely (such >> as to other ASes). >> >> The last call will end at 12 noon BST on April 9th 2008. >> >> Please send your comments to the CCAMP list or direct to the CCAMP >> chairs. >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian and Deborah >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > Best regards, Mach Chen _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
