Abhay, I have two questions regarding draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-00.txt.
First, the Intended Status is given as "Standards Track". Is this a mistake? I thought all three OSPF-MANET drafts were supposed to be Experimental. Second, I noticed that the concept of "Unsynchronized Adjacencies", along with the "Unsynchronized SPT" and the "Unsynchronized" bit (U-bit) are not included in the draft, even though they were included in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roy-ospf-smart-peering-01 I thought this concept was needed in order to distinguish between synchronized links and unsynchronized links in Router-LSAs, to avoid a circular dependency problem. Is this also a mistake, or is there a reason for this omission? Richard _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
